Literature DB >> 17547220

Access to and quality of health and social care for rare diseases: patients' and caregivers' experiences.

Y Kodra1, P R Morosini, R Petrigliano, E Agazio, P Salerno, D Taruscio.   

Abstract

People suffering from rare diseases, independently of the condition, often experience the same problems in receiving adequate health and social care. It is not clear how these problems differ in severity among different diseases and in different countries and how they change in time. In the framework of the NEPHIRD (Network of Public Health Institutions on Rare Diseases), a European project, funded by DG-SANCO (EU Commission), an effort was made to develop a simple but comprehensive tool to show patients' and/or caregivers' opinions about the quality and accessibility of health and social services. The self-filled questionnaire asks how often patients or caregivers had both negative and positive experiences about the quality and accessibility of health and social services and their opinion on their improvement, on 5-level scales. A pilot survey was carried out in several European Countries among members of Myasthenia Gravis, Neurofibromatosis, Prader Willi and Rett Syndrome volunteers' associations. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed using Stata and Epi Info 2000. In total, 302 questionnaires were completed in France, Italy, Romania, Spain, Turkey and United Kingdom during 2004-05. In general, respondents thought that health care accessibility was worse than quality, and that social care and legal provisions were worse than health care, with some differences among countries. For all diseases, and for both patients and caregivers, the most frequent reported positive experiences were health professionals' kindness and readiness to help (all medians ranged from 3 to 5). As for the efforts for improvement made by public services in the last three years, the opinions were generally favourable. This study has several limitations. However the assessment tool that has been developed has some innovative and interesting features and may be considered a useful attempt to compare patients' and caregivers' experiences for a range of different diseases, countries and services, with respect to a rare disease programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17547220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Ig        ISSN: 1120-9135


  3 in total

Review 1.  Exploring patient and family involvement in the lifecycle of an orphan drug: a scoping review.

Authors:  Andrea Young; Devidas Menon; Jackie Street; Walla Al-Hertani; Tania Stafinski
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.123

2.  Australian children living with rare diseases: experiences of diagnosis and perceived consequences of diagnostic delays.

Authors:  Yvonne Zurynski; Marie Deverell; Troy Dalkeith; Sandra Johnson; John Christodoulou; Helen Leonard; Elizabeth J Elliott
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.123

3.  Key outcomes from stakeholder workshops at a symposium to inform the development of an Australian national plan for rare diseases.

Authors:  Caron Molster; Leanne Youngs; Emma Hammond; Hugh Dawkins
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.123

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.