Literature DB >> 17546747

Top-down guidance in visual search for facial expressions.

Sowon Hahn1, Scott D Gronlund.   

Abstract

Using a visual search paradigm, we investigated how a top-down goal modified attentional bias for threatening facial expressions. In two experiments, participants searched for a facial expression either based on stimulus characteristics or a top-down goal. In Experiment 1 participants searched for a discrepant facial expression in a homogenous crowd of faces. Consistent with previous research, we obtained a shallower response time (RT) slope when the target face was angry than when it was happy. In Experiment 2, participants searched for a specific type of facial expression (allowing a top-down goal). When the display included a target, we found a shallower RT slope for the angry than for the happy face search. However, when an angry or happy face was present in the display in opposition to the task goal, we obtained equivalent RT slopes, suggesting that the mere presence of an angry face in opposition to the task goal did not support the well-known angry face superiority effect. Furthermore, RT distribution analyses supported the special status of an angry face only when it was combined with the top-down goal. On the basis of these results, we suggest that a threatening facial expression may guide attention as a high-priority stimulus in the absence of a specific goal; however, in the presence of a specific goal, the efficiency of facial expression search is dependent on the combined influence of a top-down goal and the stimulus characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17546747     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion.

Authors:  J D Eastwood; D Smilek; P M Merikle
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-08

2.  Emotional facial expressions capture attention.

Authors:  P Vuilleumier; S Schwartz
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-01-23       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  The serial-parallel dilemma: a case study in a linkage of theory and method.

Authors:  James T Townsend; Michael J Wenger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

4.  Aging and visual search: automatic and controlled attentional bias to threat faces.

Authors:  Sowon Hahn; Curt Carlson; Shawn Singer; Scott D Gronlund
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2006-03-09

5.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?

Authors:  E Fox; R Russo; R Bowles; K Dutton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

6.  Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala.

Authors:  J S Morris; A Ohman; R J Dolan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-06-04       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli.

Authors:  A Ohman; D Lundqvist; F Esteves
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-03

8.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect.

Authors:  C H Hansen; R D Hansen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-06

9.  Faces and facial expressions do not pop out.

Authors:  H C Nothdurft
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently?

Authors:  Elaine Fox; Victoria Lester; Riccardo Russo; R J Bowles; Alessio Pichler; Kevin Dutton
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2000-01-01
View more
  11 in total

1.  Threat reduces value-driven but not salience-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Andy Jeesu Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-03-14

2.  Search for a threatening target triggers limbic guidance of spatial attention.

Authors:  Aprajita Mohanty; Tobias Egner; Jim M Monti; M-Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Effects of a Brief Mindfulness-Based Attentional Intervention on Threat-Related Perceptual Decision-Making.

Authors:  Sungjin Im; Maya A Marder; Gabriella Imbriano; Tamara J Sussman; Aprajita Mohanty
Journal:  Mindfulness (N Y)       Date:  2021-01-02

4.  When does hearing laughter draw attention to happy faces? Task relevance determines the influence of a crossmodal affective context on emotional attention.

Authors:  Pieter Van Dessel; Julia Vogt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Seeing through rose-colored glasses: How optimistic expectancies guide visual attention.

Authors:  Laura Kress; Mirko Bristle; Tatjana Aue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over right intraparietal sulcus enhances emotional face processing in the left visual field.

Authors:  Chenggui Fan; Chaoyang Wan; Junjun Zhang; Zhenlan Jin; Ling Li
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Do all inhibitions act alike? A study of go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.

Authors:  Ran Littman; Ádám Takács
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Furious snarling: Teeth-exposure and anxiety-related attentional bias towards angry faces.

Authors:  Benedikt Emanuel Wirth; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Irrelevant task suppresses the N170 of automatic attention allocation to fearful faces.

Authors:  Haoran Dou; Limei Liang; Jie Ma; Jiachen Lu; Wenhai Zhang; Yang Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Top-down modulation of attention by emotion.

Authors:  Aprajita Mohanty; Tamara J Sussman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.