Literature DB >> 17546733

Sequential effects in time perception.

Tamsen E Taylor1, Stephen J Lupker.   

Abstract

Taylor and Lupker (2001) reported that in a naming task, stimuli were named more rapidly when preceded by an easy-to-name stimulus than when preceded by a difficult-to-name stimulus (sequential effects). The goal of the present research was to investigate whether sequential effects could be explained in terms of time perception processes (within the context of Lupker, Brown, and Colombo's [1997] time criterion account). Participants were required to name easy and difficult stimuli (high-frequency words and nonwords in Experiment 1; words only in Experiment 2). Each naming trial was followed by a set of asterisks (*****). The participants were required to press a button when they thought the asterisks had been presented for exactly 1 sec. Time intervals produced after naming difficult stimuli were longer than time intervals produced after naming easy stimuli. That is, time perception was affected by the difficulty of word/nonword naming in a way that carried over to the next stimulus, supporting the idea that carryover effects in time perception may be the source of sequential effects in the naming task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17546733     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Effects of filler type in naming: change in time criterion or attentional control of pathways?

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-12

2.  Long-term inhibition of return of attention.

Authors:  Steven P Tipper; Sarah Grison; Klaus Kessler
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-01

3.  Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed.

Authors:  R E Hicks; G W Miller; M Kinsbourne
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1976-12

4.  Time perception and word recognition: an elaboration of the time-criterion account.

Authors:  Tamsen E Taylor; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-08

5.  Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality.

Authors:  L Casini; F Macar
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

6.  Common Words are Longer in Apparent Duration than are Rare Words.

Authors:  Larry Hochhaus; Leila G Swanson; Ann L Carter
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1991-01

7.  Duration Ratings as an Index of Processing Resources Required for Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  Garvin Chastain; F Richard Ferraro
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1997-01

8.  Influence of word frequency and length on the apparent duration of tachistoscopic presentations.

Authors:  J S Warm; R E McCray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-01

9.  Time estimation and concurrent nontemporal processing: specific interference from short-term-memory demands.

Authors:  C Fortin; R Rousseau; P Bourque; E Kirouac
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-05

10.  Time perception and attention: the effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration.

Authors:  S W Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.