Literature DB >> 17545826

Removal of EEG noise and artifact using blind source separation.

S P Fitzgibbon1, D M W Powers, K J Pope, C R Clark.   

Abstract

A study was performed to investigate and compare the relative performance of blind signal separation (BSS) algorithms at separating common types of contamination from EEG. The study develops a novel framework for investigating and comparing the relative performance of BSS algorithms that incorporates a realistic EEG simulation with a known mixture of known signals and an objective performance metric. The key finding is that although BSS is an effective and powerful tool for separating and removing contamination from EEG, the quality of the separation is highly dependant on the type of contamination, the degree of contamination, and the choice of BSS algorithm. BSS appears to be most effective at separating muscle and blink contamination and less effective at saccadic and tracking contamination. For all types of contamination, principal components analysis is a strong performer when the contamination is greater in amplitude than the brain signal whereas other algorithms such as second-order blind inference and Infomax are generally better for specific types of contamination of lower amplitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17545826     DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3180556926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  12 in total

1.  Removal of muscular artifacts in EEG signals: a comparison of linear decomposition methods.

Authors:  Laura Frølich; Irene Dowding
Journal:  Brain Inform       Date:  2018-01-10

2.  Electromyogenic Artifacts and Electroencephalographic Inferences Revisited.

Authors:  Brenton W McMenamin; Alexander J Shackman; Lawrence L Greischar; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Validation of regression-based myogenic correction techniques for scalp and source-localized EEG.

Authors:  Brenton W McMenamin; Alexander J Shackman; Jeffrey S Maxwell; Lawrence L Greischar; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Validation of ICA-based myogenic artifact correction for scalp and source-localized EEG.

Authors:  Brenton W McMenamin; Alexander J Shackman; Jeffrey S Maxwell; David R W Bachhuber; Adam M Koppenhaver; Lawrence L Greischar; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Electromyogenic artifacts and electroencephalographic inferences.

Authors:  Alexander J Shackman; Brenton W McMenamin; Heleen A Slagter; Jeffrey S Maxwell; Lawrence L Greischar; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 6.  Electroencephalogram-based pharmacodynamic measures: a review.

Authors:  Michael Bewernitz; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.366

7.  Automatic classification of artifactual ICA-components for artifact removal in EEG signals.

Authors:  Irene Winkler; Stefan Haufe; Michael Tangermann
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.759

8.  Low Complexity Automatic Stationary Wavelet Transform for Elimination of Eye Blinks from EEG.

Authors:  Mohammad Shahbakhti; Maxime Maugeon; Matin Beiramvand; Vaidotas Marozas
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-12-02

Review 9.  Evolution of electroencephalogram signal analysis techniques during anesthesia.

Authors:  Mahmoud I Al-Kadi; Mamun Bin Ibne Reaz; Mohd Alauddin Mohd Ali
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Comparing the Performance of Popular MEG/EEG Artifact Correction Methods in an Evoked-Response Study.

Authors:  Niels Trusbak Haumann; Lauri Parkkonen; Marina Kliuchko; Peter Vuust; Elvira Brattico
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.