Literature DB >> 17545533

A phase I, randomized, open-label, parallel-cohort, dose-finding study of elacridar (GF120918) and oral topotecan in cancer patients.

Isa E L M Kuppens1, Els O Witteveen, Roxanne C Jewell, Sandra A Radema, Elaine M Paul, Steve G Mangum, Jos H Beijnen, Emile E Voest, Jan H M Schellens.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) substantially limits the oral bioavailability of topotecan. Coadministration with elacridar, an inhibitor of breast cancer resistance protein-mediated drug transport, increases the bioavailability of topotecan. The aim of this study was to establish the lowest effective dose of elacridar to obtain maximum oral bioavailability of topotecan and to determine the optimal schedule of coadministration of oral topotecan and elacridar. In the second part of this study, dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of oral topotecan coadministered with elacridar, at a daily times five regimen administered every 21 days, were established. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: In part I, 20 patients were randomized to receive 100, 300, 500, 700, or 1,000 mg of elacridar on days 1 and 8 1 h before or simultaneously with 2.0 mg oral topotecan, which was also randomized. On day 15, all patients were treated with 1.5 mg/m(2) i.v. topotecan. In part II of the study, patients were treated daily with oral topotecan and with the lowest effective dose of elacridar following from part I. The maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity were determined in cohorts of three patients. Blood samples were taken on days 1, 8, and 15 of part I and on day 1 of cycles 1 and 2 of part II.
RESULTS: Complete apparent oral bioavailability of topotecan (102 +/- 7%) for all treatment arms with elacridar in both schedules was seen in part I. In the topotecan dose escalation part, two dose-limiting toxicities were seen at the 2.5 mg topotecan dose level.
CONCLUSION: The recommended schedule is 2.0 mg oral topotecan plus 100 mg elacridar administered concomitantly daily times five every 21 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17545533     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  51 in total

Review 1.  The controversial role of ABC transporters in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Akina Tamaki; Caterina Ierano; Gergely Szakacs; Robert W Robey; Susan E Bates
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 8.000

2.  Pharmacokinetic interaction study of sulphasalazine in healthy subjects and the impact of curcumin as an in vivo inhibitor of BCRP.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kusuhara; Hidetoshi Furuie; Akihiro Inano; Akihiro Sunagawa; Saiko Yamada; Chunyong Wu; Shinya Fukizawa; Nozomi Morimoto; Ichiro Ieiri; Mariko Morishita; Kiminobu Sumita; Hiroshi Mayahara; Takuya Fujita; Kazuya Maeda; Yuichi Sugiyama
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Reversal of ABC drug transporter-mediated multidrug resistance in cancer cells: evaluation of current strategies.

Authors:  Chung-Pu Wu; Anna Maria Calcagno; Suresh V Ambudkar
Journal:  Curr Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.339

4.  N-(4-[2-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-6,7-dimethoxy-2-isoquinolinyl)ethyl]-phenyl)-9,10-dihydro-5-methoxy-9-oxo-4-acridine carboxamide (GF120918) as a chemical ATP-binding cassette transporter family G member 2 (Abcg2) knockout model to study nitrofurantoin transfer into milk.

Authors:  Lipeng Wang; Markos Leggas; Mamta Goswami; Philip E Empey; Patrick J McNamara
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 5.  Therapeutic Potential and Utility of Elacridar with Respect to P-glycoprotein Inhibition: An Insight from the Published In Vitro, Preclinical and Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Ranjeet Prasad Dash; R Jayachandra Babu; Nuggehally R Srinivas
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 6.  Oral anticancer drugs: mechanisms of low bioavailability and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  Frederik E Stuurman; Bastiaan Nuijen; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Expression and function of ABCG2 and XIAP in glioblastomas.

Authors:  Ivette F Emery; Archana Gopalan; Stephanie Wood; Kin-Hoe Chow; Chiara Battelli; Joshy George; Hagen Blaszyk; Jeffrey Florman; Kyuson Yun
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 8.  Solving the Blood-Brain Barrier Challenge for the Effective Treatment of HIV Replication in the Central Nervous System.

Authors:  Luc Bertrand; Madhavan Nair; Michal Toborek
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.116

9.  Inhibition of Autophagy by Chloroquine Enhances the Antitumor Efficacy of Sorafenib in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Xiangyu Liu; Kangjian Sun; Handong Wang; Yuyuan Dai
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.046

10.  Synthesis and small-animal positron emission tomography evaluation of [11C]-elacridar as a radiotracer to assess the distribution of P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier.

Authors:  Bernd Dörner; Claudia Kuntner; Jens P Bankstahl; Marion Bankstahl; Johann Stanek; Thomas Wanek; Gloria Stundner; Severin Mairinger; Wolfgang Löscher; Markus Müller; Oliver Langer; Thomas Erker
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 7.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.