Literature DB >> 17544774

Natural course of intraocular pressure after cataract surgery with sodium hyaluronate 1% versus hydroxypropylmethylcellulose 2%.

Georg Rainer1, Katharina Emanuela Schmid, Oliver Findl, Stefan Sacu, Barbara Kiss, Harald Heinzl, Rupert Menapace.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the natural course of intraocular pressure (IOP) after small-incision cataract surgery with sodium hyaluronate 1% versus hydroxypropylmethylcellulose 2%.
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty eyes of 40 consecutive patients with bilateral age-related cataract.
METHODS: The patients were assigned randomly to receive sodium hyaluronate 1% or hydroxypropylmethylcellulose 2% during cataract surgery in the first eye. The second eye received the other ophthalmic viscosurgical device. The IOP was measured preoperatively and 30 minutes; 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 20 to 24 hours; and 1 week postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Postoperative IOP increase.
RESULTS: The highest mean IOP increase occurred at 8 hours postoperatively (5.3+/-6.4 mmHg) in the sodium hyaluronate 1% group and at 2 hours postoperatively (7.8+/-6.1 mmHg) in the hydroxypropylmethylcellulose 2% group. Overall, the IOP increase was higher with hydroxypropylmethylcellulose 2% (P = 0.005). Intraocular pressure spikes to > or =30 mmHg occurred in 5 eyes (13%) in the sodium hyaluronate 1% group and 13 eyes (33%) in the hydroxypropylmethylcellulose 2% group.
CONCLUSIONS: Sodium hyaluronate 1% and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose 2% caused significant IOP increases during the first 8 hours after cataract surgery. A single measurement at 6 hours postoperatively could detect all IOP spikes in the sodium hyaluronate 1% group. In the hydroxypropylmethylcellulose 2% group, a single measurement at 2 hours postoperatively could detect two thirds of IOP spikes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17544774     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  7 in total

1.  Intraocular lens implantation without the use of ophthalmic viscosurgical device.

Authors:  Ugur Unsal; Gonen Baser; Mehmet Soyler
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Effect of 1% brinzolamide and 0.5% timolol fixed combination on intraocular pressure after cataract surgery with phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Kemal Ornek; Nesrin Büyüktortop; Nurgül Ornek; Reyhan Oğurel; Inci Elif Erbahçeci; Zafer Onaran
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 3.  Impact of Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices in Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Monali S Malvankar-Mehta; Angel Fu; Yasoda Subramanian; Cindy Hutnik
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  A clinical comparison between DisCoVisc and 2% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose in phacoemulsification: a fellow eye study.

Authors:  Rodrigo F Espíndola; Emerson F S Castro; Marcony R Santhiago; Newton Kara-Junior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Safety, efficacy, and intraoperative characteristics of DisCoVisc and Healon ophthalmic viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery.

Authors:  Satish S Modi; James A Davison; Tom Walters
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-23

6.  Balanced Salt Solution-Assisted Intraocular Lens Implantation in Phacoemulsification Surgery: Intraocular Pressure and Endothelial Cell Effects.

Authors:  Erdem Yuksel; Baran Ozdemir; Mehmet Ozgur Cubuk
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2019-02-20

7.  Phacoemulsification and IOL-Implantation without Using Viscoelastics: Combined Modeling of Thermo Fluid Dynamics, Clinical Outcomes, and Endothelial Cell Density.

Authors:  Nikola Goles; Marko Nerancic; Sanja Konjik; Brigitte Pajic-Eggspuehler; Bojan Pajic; Zeljka Cvejic
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.