PURPOSE: To evaluate tumor and normal tissue dosimetry of a 5 cobalt gray equivalent (CGE) x 5 fraction proton radiotherapy schedule, before initiating a clinical trial of neoadjuvant, short-course proton radiotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The first 9 pancreatic cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (1.8 Gy x 28) at the Massachusetts General Hospital had treatment plans generated using a 5 CGE x 5 fraction proton regimen. To facilitate dosimetric comparisons, clinical target volumes and normal tissue volumes were held constant. Plans were optimized for target volume coverage and normal tissue sparing. RESULTS: Hypofractionated proton and conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans both provided acceptable target volume coverage and dose homogeneity. Improved dose conformality provided by the hypofractionated proton regimen resulted in significant sparing of kidneys, liver, and small bowel, evidenced by significant reductions in the mean doses, expressed as percentage prescribed dose, to these structures. Kidney and liver sparing was most evident in low-dose regions (< or =20% prescribed dose for both kidneys and < or =60% prescribed dose for liver). Improvements in small-bowel dosimetry were observed in high- and low-dose regions. Mean stomach and duodenum doses, expressed as percentage prescribed dose, were similar for the two techniques. CONCLUSIONS: A proton radiotherapy schedule consisting of 5 fractions of 5 CGE as part of neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas seems dosimetrically feasible, providing excellent target volume coverage, dose homogeneity, and normal tissue sparing. Hypofractionated proton radiotherapy in this setting merits Phase I clinical trial investigation.
PURPOSE: To evaluate tumor and normal tissue dosimetry of a 5 cobalt gray equivalent (CGE) x 5 fraction proton radiotherapy schedule, before initiating a clinical trial of neoadjuvant, short-course proton radiotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The first 9 pancreatic cancerpatients treated with neoadjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (1.8 Gy x 28) at the Massachusetts General Hospital had treatment plans generated using a 5 CGE x 5 fraction proton regimen. To facilitate dosimetric comparisons, clinical target volumes and normal tissue volumes were held constant. Plans were optimized for target volume coverage and normal tissue sparing. RESULTS: Hypofractionated proton and conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans both provided acceptable target volume coverage and dose homogeneity. Improved dose conformality provided by the hypofractionated proton regimen resulted in significant sparing of kidneys, liver, and small bowel, evidenced by significant reductions in the mean doses, expressed as percentage prescribed dose, to these structures. Kidney and liver sparing was most evident in low-dose regions (< or =20% prescribed dose for both kidneys and < or =60% prescribed dose for liver). Improvements in small-bowel dosimetry were observed in high- and low-dose regions. Mean stomach and duodenum doses, expressed as percentage prescribed dose, were similar for the two techniques. CONCLUSIONS: A proton radiotherapy schedule consisting of 5 fractions of 5 CGE as part of neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas seems dosimetrically feasible, providing excellent target volume coverage, dose homogeneity, and normal tissue sparing. Hypofractionated proton radiotherapy in this setting merits Phase I clinical trial investigation.
Authors: Ted C Ling; Jerry M Slater; Rachel Mifflin; Prashanth Nookala; Roger Grove; Anh M Ly; Baldev Patyal; Jerry D Slater; Gary Y Yang Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2015-04
Authors: Theodore S Hong; David P Ryan; Darrell R Borger; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Beow Y Yeap; Marek Ancukiewicz; Vikram Deshpande; Shweta Shinagare; Jennifer Y Wo; Yves Boucher; Raymond C Wadlow; Eunice L Kwak; Jill N Allen; Jeffrey W Clark; Andrew X Zhu; Cristina R Ferrone; Harvey J Mamon; Judith Adams; Barbara Winrich; Tarin Grillo; Rakesh K Jain; Thomas F DeLaney; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo; Dan G Duda Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-05-24 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Richard Y Lee; Romaine C Nichols; Soon N Huh; Meng W Ho; Zuofeng Li; Robert Zaiden; Ziad T Awad; Bestoun Ahmed; Bradfors S Hoppe Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2013-12
Authors: Tae Hyun Kim; Woo Jin Lee; Sang Myung Woo; Hyunjung Kim; Eun Sang Oh; Ju Hee Lee; Sung-Sik Han; Sang-Jae Park; Yang-Gun Suh; Sung Ho Moon; Sang Soo Kim; Dae Yong Kim Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-01-01
Authors: Krishan R Jethwa; Erik J Tryggestad; Thomas J Whitaker; Broc T Giffey; Bret D Kazemba; Michelle A Neben-Wittich; Kenneth W Merrell; Michael G Haddock; Christopher L Hallemeier Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-04-13