Literature DB >> 17544266

Information about cancer clinical trials: an analysis of Internet resources.

Craig P Carden1, Michael Jefford, Mark A Rosenthal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical trials are critical to improving patient outcomes, but participation in cancer clinical trials is low. Patient understanding of clinical trial process is also limited. Patients are increasingly using the Internet as a source of information. It is critical that such Internet-based information is relevant, current, balanced, and easy to access and navigate. We critically reviewed seven international online resources that provide information for patients/consumers regarding cancer clinical trials.
METHODS: Seven international websites from North America, Europe and Australia were selected based on profile/usage. Sites were evaluated with respect to their content, readability and appropriateness using a suite of standard assessment tools.
RESULTS: No sites performed well in terms of all assessment criteria. There was substantial variation between sites regarding information provided, content, design and readability. All sites required high literacy levels and assessment using the Standard Assessment of Means tool showed consistent deficiencies.
CONCLUSION: Although there are numerous websites providing information about cancer clinical trials to patients/consumers, all evaluated sites have several shortcomings. Attention to the content of information, its presentation and the design of Internet resources has an ethical imperative, and is likely to lead to improved patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17544266     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  4 in total

Review 1.  Information on the internet for asplenic patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mark A Downing; Ahmed H Omar; Elham Sabri; Anne E McCarthy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Iterative evaluation of a web-based health information resource.

Authors:  Lindsay Rosenfeld; Amy Shepherd; Amenah A Agunwamba; Alexa T McCray
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013-04-11

3.  Consumer input into research: the Australian Cancer Trials website.

Authors:  Rachel F Dear; Alexandra L Barratt; Sally Crossing; Phyllis N Butow; Susan Hanson; Martin Hn Tattersall
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2011-06-26

4.  The quality of web-based oncology guidelines and protocols: how do international sites stack up?

Authors:  J M Langton; A K Drew; L Mellish; J Olivier; R L Ward; S-A Pearson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.