Literature DB >> 17544083

Pancreatic resection in Veterans Affairs and selected university medical centers: results of the patient safety in surgery study.

Robert E Glasgow1, Heidi H Jackson, Leigh Neumayer, Tracy L Schifftner, Shukri F Khuri, William G Henderson, Sean J Mulvihill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatectomy is a high-risk, technically demanding operation associated with substantial perioperative morbidity and mortality. This study aims to describe the 30-day morbidity and mortality for pancreatectomy and to compare outcomes between private-sector and Veterans Affairs hospitals using multiinstitutional data. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent pancreatic resection for neoplasia at private-sector (PS) and Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals participating in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Patient Safety in Surgery Study in fiscal years 2002 to 2004. The variables reviewed were demographics, preoperative medical conditions, intraoperative variables, and outcomes. Using logistic regression to control for differences in patient comorbidities, 30-day mortality and morbidity rates between PS and VA hospitals were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 1,069 patients underwent pancreatectomy for neoplasia at 97 participating hospitals. Six hundred ninety-two patients were treated at PS hospitals and 377 at VA hospitals. The average number of patients treated at each hospital was 11.0, with a range of 1 to 83 during the 3-year study period. There were 842 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPT 4815x) and 227 who underwent distal/subtotal pancreatectomy (CPT 4814x). Significant differences were observed between PS patients and VA patients with regard to comorbidities and patient demographics. The 30-day unadjusted morbidity rate was 33.8% overall, 42.2% at VA hospitals versus 29.1% at PS hospitals (p < 0.0001). Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio (OR) for postoperative morbidity comparing VA with PS hospitals was 1.781 (95% CI, 1.369-2.318) and 1.581 (95% CI, 1.064-2.307). The 30-day unadjusted operative mortality rate was 3.8% overall, 6.4% at VA hospitals and 2.5% at PS hospitals (p = 0.0015). Unadjusted and adjusted OR for postoperative mortality was 2.909 (95% CI, 1.525-5.549) and 2.533 (95% CI, 1.020-6.290), respectively. Similar outcomes were observed when looking at pancreaticoduodenectomy (CPT 4815x) when analyzed independent of other types of pancreatic resections.
CONCLUSION: Pancreatectomies are high-risk operations with substantial perioperative morbidity and mortality. Risk-adjusted outcomes for patients treated at PS hospitals were found to be superior to those for patients treated at VA hospitals in the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17544083     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  19 in total

1.  Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource.

Authors:  Purvi Parikh; Mira Shiloach; Mark E Cohen; Karl Y Bilimoria; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce L Hall; Henry A Pitt
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Modified Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy: technical improvement in matched historical control study.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Suguru Yamada; Mitsuro Kanda; Masaya Suenaga; Hideki Takami; Masashi Hattori; Yoshikuni Inokawa; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Sociodemographics and comorbidities influence decisions to undergo pancreatic resection for neoplastic lesions.

Authors:  Charbel Sandroussi; Chantelle Brace; Erin D Kennedy; Nancy N Baxter; Steven Gallinger; Alice C Wei
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Comparing VA and Non-VA Quality of Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Claire O'Hanlon; Christina Huang; Elizabeth Sloss; Rebecca Anhang Price; Peter Hussey; Carrie Farmer; Courtney Gidengil
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Nutritional risk index as an independent predictive factor for the development of surgical site infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hiroji Shinkawa; Shigekazu Takemura; Takahiro Uenishi; Masayuki Sakae; Kazunori Ohata; Yorihisa Urata; Kazuhisa Kaneda; Akinori Nozawa; Shoji Kubo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Screening for pancreatic cancer: why, how, and who?

Authors:  Katherine E Poruk; Matthew A Firpo; Douglas G Adler; Sean J Mulvihill
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  ACS-NSQIP has the potential to create an HPB-NSQIP option.

Authors:  Henry A Pitt; Molly Kilbane; Steven M Strasberg; Timothy M Pawlik; Elijah Dixon; Nicholas J Zyromski; Thomas A Aloia; J Michael Henderson; Sean J Mulvihill
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Feeding patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a UK national survey.

Authors:  Mary Phillips; Jeffrey T Lordan; Neville Menezes; Nariman D Karanjia
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Polypropylene mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy for periampullar neoplasm.

Authors:  Di-Yu Huang; Xian-Fa Wang; Wei Zhou; Ying Xin; Yi-Ping Mou; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Preoperative predictors for complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: impact of BMI and body fat distribution.

Authors:  Michael G House; Yuman Fong; Dean J Arnaoutakis; Rohit Sharma; Corinne B Winston; Mladjan Protic; Mithat Gonen; Sara H Olson; Robert C Kurtz; Murray F Brennan; Peter J Allen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.