Literature DB >> 17543998

Noisy attractors and ergodic sets in models of gene regulatory networks.

Andre S Ribeiro1, Stuart A Kauffman.   

Abstract

We investigate the hypothesis that cell types are attractors. This hypothesis was criticized with the fact that real gene networks are noisy systems and, thus, do not have attractors [Kadanoff, L., Coppersmith, S., Aldana, M., 2002. Boolean Dynamics with Random Couplings. http://www.citebase.org/abstract?id=oai:arXiv.org:nlin/0204062]. Given the concept of "ergodic set" as a set of states from which the system, once entering, does not leave when subject to internal noise, first, using the Boolean network model, we show that if all nodes of states on attractors are subject to internal state change with a probability p due to noise, multiple ergodic sets are very unlikely. Thereafter, we show that if a fraction of those nodes are "locked" (not subject to state fluctuations caused by internal noise), multiple ergodic sets emerge. Finally, we present an example of a gene network, modelled with a realistic model of transcription and translation and gene-gene interaction, driven by a stochastic simulation algorithm with multiple time-delayed reactions, which has internal noise and that we also subject to external perturbations. We show that, in this case, two distinct ergodic sets exist and are stable within a wide range of parameters variations and, to some extent, to external perturbations.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17543998     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  19 in total

1.  Inverse perturbation for optimal intervention in gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Nidhal Bouaynaya; Roman Shterenberg; Dan Schonfeld
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Probabilistic edge weights fine-tune Boolean network dynamics.

Authors:  Dávid Deritei; Nina Kunšič; Péter Csermely
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Digital clocks: simple Boolean models can quantitatively describe circadian systems.

Authors:  Ozgur E Akman; Steven Watterson; Andrew Parton; Nigel Binns; Andrew J Millar; Peter Ghazal
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Modeling stochasticity and variability in gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  David Murrugarra; Alan Veliz-Cuba; Boris Aguilar; Seda Arat; Reinhard Laubenbacher
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2012-06-06

5.  A dynamical model of genetic networks for cell differentiation.

Authors:  Marco Villani; Alessia Barbieri; Roberto Serra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Balancing robustness against the dangers of multiple attractors in a Hopfield-type model of biological attractors.

Authors:  Ron C Anafi; Jason H T Bates
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Collective dynamics of gene expression in cell populations.

Authors:  Elad Stolovicki; Erez Braun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evolving sensitivity balances Boolean Networks.

Authors:  Jamie X Luo; Matthew S Turner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  On the dynamical properties of a model of cell differentiation.

Authors:  Marco Villani; Roberto Serra
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2013-02-19

10.  Robustness and information propagation in attractors of Random Boolean Networks.

Authors:  Jason Lloyd-Price; Abhishekh Gupta; Andre S Ribeiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.