Literature DB >> 1754362

The object-detection effect: configuration enhances perception.

D G Purcell1, A L Stewart.   

Abstract

Line drawings used by Weisstein and Harris (1974) are seen as box-like three-dimensional figures if the lines are arranged properly. A flat two-dimensional pattern is seen when these same lines are disarranged. A target line contained within the three-dimensional figure is identified more readily than is the same line contained within a two-dimensional figure. This finding was extended in the present experiments: The three-dimensional stimulus was detected more quickly than the two-dimensional stimulus, under conditions of visual backward masking. Three-dimensional stimuli were also classified more quickly than two-dimensional stimuli. Just as with the face-detection effect and the word-detection effect, object detection can be affected by the form of the visual stimulus.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1754362     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  19 in total

1.  Context superiority in a detection task with line-element stimuli: a low-level effect.

Authors:  A Gorea; B Julesz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Object-centered encoding by face-selective neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey.

Authors:  M E Hasselmo; E T Rolls; G C Baylis; V Nalwa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual detection of line segments: an object-superiority effect.

Authors:  N Weisstein; C S Harris
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Masking of spatial and identity information from geometric forms by a visual noise field.

Authors:  L Smythe; D L Finkel
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1974-12

5.  An analysis of hierarchical processing in visual perception.

Authors:  A O Dick; S O Dick
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1969-06

6.  The effect of perceived depth and connectedness on metacontrast functions.

Authors:  M C Williams; N Weisstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Neurons in the cortex of the temporal lobe and in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces.

Authors:  E T Rolls
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1984

8.  Perceived depth vs. structural relevance in the object-superiority effect.

Authors:  M Lanze; N Weisstein; J R Harris
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-04

9.  Spatial frequency response and perceived depth in the time-course of object superiority.

Authors:  M C Williams; N Weisstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The line-in-object superiority effect in perception: it depends on where you fix your eyes and what is located at the point of fixation.

Authors:  B Earhard
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07
View more
  6 in total

1.  The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

2.  Follow your heart: Emotion adaptively influences perception.

Authors:  Jeanine K Stefanucci; Kyle T Gagnon; David A Lessard
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2011-06

3.  Context-produced increase in visibility.

Authors:  D L King; H Hicks; P D Brown
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1993

4.  Two effects of context on the presence/absence of connecting segments.

Authors:  D L King; J Thomas
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-05

5.  The word without the tachistoscope.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; B Silvers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-03

6.  Visual working memory for connected 3D objects: effects of stimulus complexity, dimensionality and connectivity.

Authors:  Chuanxiuyue He; Peri Gunalp; Hauke S Meyerhoff; Zoe Rathbun; Mike Stieff; Steven L Franconeri; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-02-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.