Literature DB >> 17543476

Adolescent smokers rate delayed rewards as less certain than adolescent nonsmokers.

Brady Reynolds1, Michele Patak, Palak Shroff.   

Abstract

This research compared adolescent smokers (n=45) and nonsmokers (n=35) on ratings of certainty about receiving delayed rewards during a delay discounting procedure. Consistent with a previous finding [Patak, M., Reynolds, B., 2007. Question-based assessments of delay discounting: do respondents spontaneously incorporate uncertainty into their valuations for delayed rewards? Addict. Behav. 32, 351-357] participants generally rated the delayed rewards as increasingly uncertain with longer delays, and ratings of certainty were correlated with delay discounting (r=.37). Also, the adolescent smokers rated the delayed rewards as significantly less certain than the nonsmokers. These findings indicate that adolescents who smoke cigarettes evaluate delayed outcomes as less certain than adolescents who do not smoke cigarettes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17543476      PMCID: PMC1991332          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  9 in total

1.  Area under the curve as a measure of discounting.

Authors:  J Myerson; L Green; M Warusawitharana
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Delay or probability discounting in a model of impulsive behavior: effect of alcohol.

Authors:  J B Richards; L Zhang; S H Mitchell; H de Wit
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Delay discounting by pathological gamblers.

Authors:  Mark R Dixon; Janice Marley; Eric A Jacobs
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

Review 4.  A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling.

Authors:  Brady Reynolds
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  A comparison of two algorithms in computerized temporal discounting procedures.

Authors:  Benjamin P Kowal; Richard Yi; Amanda C Erisman; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Laboratory and self-report assessments of impulsive behavior in adolescent daily smokers and nonsmokers.

Authors:  Brady Reynolds; Michele Patak; Palak Shroff; Robert B Penfold; Shane Melanko; Amy M Duhig
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Question-based assessments of delay discounting: do respondents spontaneously incorporate uncertainty into their valuations for delayed rewards?

Authors:  Michele Patak; Brady Reynolds
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Functional parameters of delay discounting assessment tasks: order of presentation.

Authors:  Elias Robles; Perla A Vargas
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Delay and probability discounting as related to different stages of adolescent smoking and non-smoking.

Authors:  Brady Reynolds; Katherine Karraker; Kimberly Horn; Jerry B. Richards
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 1.777

  9 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  A developmental perspective on neuroeconomic mechanisms of contingency management.

Authors:  Catherine Stanger; Alan J Budney; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2012-06-04

2.  Early life adversity and increased delay discounting: Findings from the Family Health Patterns project.

Authors:  Ashley Acheson; Andrea S Vincent; Andrew Cohoon; William R Lovallo
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Delay discounting predicts adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome.

Authors:  Catherine Stanger; Stacy R Ryan; Hongyun Fu; Reid D Landes; Bryan A Jones; Warren K Bickel; Alan J Budney
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  James MacKillop; Michael T Amlung; Lauren R Few; Lara A Ray; Lawrence H Sweet; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Delay discounting by adolescents experimenting with cigarette smoking.

Authors:  Brady Reynolds; Sherecce Fields
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Altered subjective reward valuation among female heavy marijuana users.

Authors:  Kathryn R Hefner; Mark J Starr
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Impulsive choice and response in dopamine agonist-related impulse control behaviors.

Authors:  Valerie Voon; Brady Reynolds; Christina Brezing; Cecile Gallea; Meliha Skaljic; Vindhya Ekanayake; Hubert Fernandez; Marc N Potenza; Raymond J Dolan; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Does temporal discounting explain unhealthy behavior? A systematic review and reinforcement learning perspective.

Authors:  Giles W Story; Ivo Vlaev; Ben Seymour; Ara Darzi; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  A hyperbolic decay of subjective probability of obtaining delayed rewards.

Authors:  Taiki Takahashi; Koki Ikeda; Toshikazu Hasegawa
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 3.759

Review 10.  A Computational Analysis of Aberrant Delay Discounting in Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Giles W Story; Michael Moutoussis; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.