OBJECTIVES: The continued advances in imaging and stent/stent-graft technology have considerably expanded the indications for endovascular approach also in vascular trauma. We report our institutional experience with endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial injuries after blunt trauma. METHODS: Between January 2000 and June 2006 out of a series of 81 patients, 10 male patients (mean age of 50+/-14 years) with peripheral arterial injuries were managed endovascularly. At admission, haemorrhagic shock was present in three patients. Artery location involved common femoral (n=2), subclavian (n=2), axillary (n=2), external iliac (n=2), superficial femoral (n=1), and popliteal (n=1). Type of lesion was as follows: pseudoaneurysm (n=4), dissection (n=4), expanding haematoma (n=1), and arterio-venous fistula (n=1). Follow-up program included visit and duplex-ultrasonography, X-rays and/or spiral-computed tomography at 6-month interval during the first year, and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: The lesion was excluded in all cases. All patients survived. Major complications did not occur. Mean hospitalisation was 13 days. Limb-salvage was 100%. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 60 months (mean 16); a late occlusion of a popliteal stent-graft was managed with another endovascular procedure. CONCLUSION: In our experience, endovascular treatment of vascular injuries after blunt trauma was feasible and effective.
OBJECTIVES: The continued advances in imaging and stent/stent-graft technology have considerably expanded the indications for endovascular approach also in vascular trauma. We report our institutional experience with endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial injuries after blunt trauma. METHODS: Between January 2000 and June 2006 out of a series of 81 patients, 10 male patients (mean age of 50+/-14 years) with peripheral arterial injuries were managed endovascularly. At admission, haemorrhagic shock was present in three patients. Artery location involved common femoral (n=2), subclavian (n=2), axillary (n=2), external iliac (n=2), superficial femoral (n=1), and popliteal (n=1). Type of lesion was as follows: pseudoaneurysm (n=4), dissection (n=4), expanding haematoma (n=1), and arterio-venous fistula (n=1). Follow-up program included visit and duplex-ultrasonography, X-rays and/or spiral-computed tomography at 6-month interval during the first year, and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: The lesion was excluded in all cases. All patients survived. Major complications did not occur. Mean hospitalisation was 13 days. Limb-salvage was 100%. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 60 months (mean 16); a late occlusion of a popliteal stent-graft was managed with another endovascular procedure. CONCLUSION: In our experience, endovascular treatment of vascular injuries after blunt trauma was feasible and effective.
Authors: C Zeckey; M Frink; M Wilhelmi; P Mommsen; U Brunnemer; C Probst; C Krettek; F Hildebrand Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 1.000