Literature DB >> 17543241

Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance: evolution as complementary imaging tools.

Ramdas G Pai1, Padmini Varadarajan.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 17543241     DOI： 10.1007/s11886-006-0027-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN： 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Reconstruction of the Left Ventricle by a Transesophageal Tomographic Technique: In Vitro and In Vivo Validation of its Volume Measurement.

Authors:  Ramdas G. Pai; Woravut Jintapakorn; Masato Tanimoto; Qi-Ling Cao; Natesa Pandian; Pravin M. Shah
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.724

Review 2.  Assessment of left ventricular mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Saul G Myerson; Nicholas G Bellenger; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable?

Authors:  N G Bellenger; M I Burgess; S G Ray; A Lahiri; A J Coats; J G Cleland; D J Pennell
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography).

Authors:  Melvin D Cheitlin; William F Armstrong; Gerard P Aurigemma; George A Beller; Fredrick Z Bierman; Jack L Davis; Pamela S Douglas; David P Faxon; Linda D Gillam; Thomas R Kimball; William G Kussmaul; Alan S Pearlman; John T Philbrick; Harry Rakowski; Daniel M Thys
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report.

Authors:  Dudley J Pennell; Udo P Sechtem; Charles B Higgins; Warren J Manning; Gerald M Pohost; Frank E Rademakers; Albert C van Rossum; Leslee J Shaw; E Kent Yucel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction.

Authors:  R J Kim; E L Chen; J A Lima; R M Judd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Abnormal myocardial phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in women with chest pain but normal coronary angiograms.

Authors:  S D Buchthal; J A den Hollander; C N Merz; W J Rogers; C J Pepine; N Reichek; B L Sharaf; S Reis; S F Kelsey; G M Pohost
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-03-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Evaluation of heart perfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gitte Nielsen; Thomas Fritz-Hansen; Christina G Dirks; Gorm B Jensen; Henrik B W Larsson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  MR imaging of myocardial perfusion and viability.

Authors:  Anja Wagner; Heiko Mahrholdt; Udo Sechtem; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.266
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular volumes to full volume magnetic resonance imaging in normal and diseased rats.

Authors:  Teresa Arias; Jiqiu Chen; Zahi A Fayad; Valentin Fuster; Roger J Hajjar; Elie R Chemaly
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 5.251
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.