Literature DB >> 17541986

Comparison of different methods of risk stratification in urgent and emergency surgery.

W D Neary1, D Prytherch, C Foy, B P Heather, J J Earnshaw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim was to compare a number of risk scoring systems prospectively in a cohort of patients who underwent non-elective surgery.
METHODS: This was a cohort study of 2349 consecutive patients who had urgent or emergency surgery in a district general hospital in the UK. All patients were scored prospectively using the Revised Goldman Cardiac Risk Index (RGCRI), Portsmouth modification of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM), Surgical Risk Score (SRS) and Biochemistry and Haematology Outcome Models (BHOM). Actual 30-day and 1-year survival rates were compared with the predicted outcomes using receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow analysis.
RESULTS: Some 141 patients (6.0 per cent) died within 30 days of operation. This increased to 254 (10.8 per cent) by 1 year. The area under the ROC curve for death within 30 days was 0.90 for P-POSSUM, 0.85 for SRS, 0.84 for BHOM and 0.73 for RGCRI. Only the first three risk scores were able to discriminate accurately within the groups (area under ROC curve over 0.8), with no significant variation between expected and observed mortality rates confirmed by Hosmer-Lemeshow analysis. Similar results were found for the ability of each score to predict outcome at 1 year.
CONCLUSION: P-POSSUM, SRS and BHOM scoring systems were all able to predict outcome after emergency and urgent surgery, but the SRS had the advantage of ease of calculation. BHOM requires only the most commonly available blood test data and the computer holding these data can easily perform the calculation. Copyright (c) 2007 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17541986     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  14 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of in-hospital mortality with the P-POSSUM scoring system in patients undergoing major digestive surgery.

Authors:  Féthi Merad; Gabriel Baron; Blandine Pasquet; Henry Hennet; Gérard Kohlmann; Fred Warlin; Bruno Desrousseaux; Abe Fingerhut; Philippe Ravaud; Jean-Marie Hay
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2. 

Authors:  Berrin Günaydın; Ömer Kurtipek
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-06-01

3.  Derivation and Validation of a Novel Physiological Emergency Surgery Acuity Score (PESAS).

Authors:  Naveen F Sangji; Jordan D Bohnen; Elie P Ramly; George C Velmahos; David C Chang; Haytham M A Kaafarani
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Increased anatomic severity predicts outcomes: Validation of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma's Emergency General Surgery score in appendicitis.

Authors:  Matthew C Hernandez; Johnathon M Aho; Elizabeth B Habermann; Asad J Choudhry; David S Morris; Martin D Zielinski
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.313

5.  Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 6.  The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  Lisette M Vernooij; Wilton A van Klei; Karel Gm Moons; Toshihiko Takada; Judith van Waes; Johanna Aag Damen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-21

7.  Value of MELD and MELD-based indices in surgical risk evaluation of cirrhotic patients: retrospective analysis of 190 cases.

Authors:  Beatriz P Costa; F Castro Sousa; Marco Serôdio; César Carvalho
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  In search of benchmarking for mortality following multiple trauma: a Swiss trauma center experience.

Authors:  Ida Füglistaler-Montali; Corinna Attenberger; Philipp Füglistaler; Augustinus L Jacob; Felix Amsler; Thomas Gross
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  A review of risk scoring systems utilised in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Aninda Chandra; Sudhakar Mangam; Deya Marzouk
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Predicting risk of death in general surgery patients on the basis of preoperative variables using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.

Authors:  Sachin Vaid; Ted Bell; Rod Grim; Vanita Ahuja
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.