PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the thymidine analogue 3'-deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine ([(18)F]FLT) is adequate for early evaluation of the response of malignant lymphoma to antiproliferative treatment in a mouse xenotransplant model. METHODS: Immunodeficient mice bearing a follicular lymphoma xenotransplant were treated with high-dose chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, n = 10), immunotherapy (CD20 mAb, ibritumomab-tiuxetan, n = 10) or radioimmunotherapy ([(90)Y]CD20 mAb, Zevalin, n = 10). Forty-eight hours after treatment, antiproliferative effects were assessed with [(18)F]FLT. Ninety minutes after i.v. injection of 5-10 MBq [(18)F]FLT, mice were sacrificed and radioactivity within the tumour and normal organs was measured using a gamma counter and calculated as % ID/g. The proliferation fraction in tissue samples derived from treated and untreated tumours was evaluated by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry, which served as the reference for proliferative activity. RESULTS: In untreated lymphoma, the mean proliferation fraction was 83.6%. After chemotherapy, the mean proliferation fraction decreased to 39.3% (p = 0.0001), after immunotherapy to 77.6% (p = 0.0078) and after radioimmunotherapy to 78.8% (p = 0.014). In none of the animals was a significant change in tumour size observed. In untreated lymphoma, tumoural [(18)F]FLT uptake was 5.4% ID/g, after chemotherapy it was 1.5% (p = 0.0005), after immunotherapy, 3.9% (non-significant), and after radioimmunotherapy, 5.8% (non-significant). CONCLUSION: In a lymphoma xenotransplant model, [(18)F]FLT detects early antiproliferative drug activity before changes in tumour size are visible. These findings further support the use of [(18)F]FLT-PET for imaging early response to treatment in malignant lymphoma.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the thymidine analogue 3'-deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine ([(18)F]FLT) is adequate for early evaluation of the response of malignant lymphoma to antiproliferative treatment in a mouse xenotransplant model. METHODS: Immunodeficient mice bearing a follicular lymphoma xenotransplant were treated with high-dose chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, n = 10), immunotherapy (CD20 mAb, ibritumomab-tiuxetan, n = 10) or radioimmunotherapy ([(90)Y]CD20 mAb, Zevalin, n = 10). Forty-eight hours after treatment, antiproliferative effects were assessed with [(18)F]FLT. Ninety minutes after i.v. injection of 5-10 MBq [(18)F]FLT, mice were sacrificed and radioactivity within the tumour and normal organs was measured using a gamma counter and calculated as % ID/g. The proliferation fraction in tissue samples derived from treated and untreated tumours was evaluated by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry, which served as the reference for proliferative activity. RESULTS: In untreated lymphoma, the mean proliferation fraction was 83.6%. After chemotherapy, the mean proliferation fraction decreased to 39.3% (p = 0.0001), after immunotherapy to 77.6% (p = 0.0078) and after radioimmunotherapy to 78.8% (p = 0.014). In none of the animals was a significant change in tumour size observed. In untreated lymphoma, tumoural [(18)F]FLT uptake was 5.4% ID/g, after chemotherapy it was 1.5% (p = 0.0005), after immunotherapy, 3.9% (non-significant), and after radioimmunotherapy, 5.8% (non-significant). CONCLUSION: In a lymphoma xenotransplant model, [(18)F]FLT detects early antiproliferative drug activity before changes in tumour size are visible. These findings further support the use of [(18)F]FLT-PET for imaging early response to treatment in malignant lymphoma.
Authors: B D Cheson; S J Horning; B Coiffier; M A Shipp; R I Fisher; J M Connors; T A Lister; J Vose; A Grillo-López; A Hagenbeek; F Cabanillas; D Klippensten; W Hiddemann; R Castellino; N L Harris; J O Armitage; W Carter; R Hoppe; G P Canellos Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andreas K Buck; Martin Hetzel; Holger Schirrmeister; Gisela Halter; Peter Möller; Clemens Kratochwil; Andreas Wahl; Gerhard Glatting; Felix M Mottaghy; Torsten Mattfeldt; Bernd Neumaier; Sven N Reske Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-12-14 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: X B Kong; Q Y Zhu; P M Vidal; K A Watanabe; B Polsky; D Armstrong; M Ostrander; S A Lang; E Muchmore; T C Chou Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1992-04 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Andreas K Buck; Holger Schirrmeister; Martin Hetzel; Mareike Von Der Heide; Gisela Halter; Gerhard Glatting; Torsten Mattfeldt; Florian Liewald; Sven N Reske; Bernd Neumaier Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-06-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Henryk Barthel; Meg Perumal; John Latigo; Qimin He; Frank Brady; Sajinder K Luthra; Pat M Price; Eric O Aboagye Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-09-04 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ning Guo; Jingping Xie; H Charles Manning; Natasha G Deane; M Sib Ansari; Robert J Coffey; John Gore; Ronald R Price; Ronald M Baldwin; J Oliver McIntyre Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Laura L Boles Ponto; Yusuf Menda; Kenneth Dornfeld; Timothy J Tewson; G Leonard Watkins; John Sunderland; Michael M Graham; John Buatti Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: Ryogo Minamimoto; Luis Fayad; Ranjana Advani; Julie Vose; Homer Macapinlac; Jane Meza; Jordan Hankins; Felix Mottaghy; Malik Juweid; Andrew Quon Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Nicolas Graf; Ken Herrmann; Jürgen den Hollander; Falko Fend; Tibor Schuster; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Reingard Senekowitsch-Schmidtke; Christian Meyer zum Büschenfelde; Christian Peschel; Markus Schwaiger; Tobias Dechow; Andreas K Buck Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2008-08-14 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Neale S Mason; Brian J Lopresti; James Ruszkiewicz; Xinxin Dong; Sonali Joyce; George Leef; Malabika Sen; Abdus S Wahed; Chester A Mathis; Jennifer R Grandis; Sufi M Thomas Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-01-05