OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new approach for monitoring and improving patient-ventilator interaction that utilizes a signal generated by the equation of motion, using improvised values for resistance and elastance obtained noninvasively. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational study in intensive care units in five European centers. PATIENTS: We studied 21 stable patients instrumented with esophageal/gastric catheters for a previous study and ventilated alternately with pressure support (PSV) and proportional assist (PAV) ventilation with a Tyco 840 ventilator. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Previously recorded digital files were analyzed in real-time by a prototype incorporating the new technology (PVI monitor, YRT, Winnipeg, Canada). Actual onsets (P(DI)-T(ONSET)) and ends (P(DI)-T(END)) of inspiratory efforts, ineffective efforts, and patient respiratory rate were identified visually from transdiaphragmatic or calculated respiratory muscle pressure. Monitor-identified T(ONSET) occurred 0.107 +/- 0.074 s after P(DI)-T(ONSET), substantially less than trigger delay observed with conventional triggering (0.326 +/- 0.086 s). End of effort was identified 0.097 +/- 0.096 s after P(DI)-T(END), significantly less than actual cycling-off delay during PSV (0.486 +/- 0.307 s) or PAV (0.277 +/- 0.084 s). The monitor detected 80% of ineffective efforts. There was excellent agreement between monitor-estimated respiratory rate and actual patient rate over a wide range (17-59/min) of patient rates (mean (+/- SD) of difference -0.2 +/- 1.9/min for pressure support and 0.2 +/- 0.9/min for proportional assist) even when large discrepancies existed (> 35/min) between patient and ventilator rates. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed approach should make it possible to improve patient-ventilator interaction and to obtain accurate estimates of true patient respiratory rate when there is nonsynchrony.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new approach for monitoring and improving patient-ventilator interaction that utilizes a signal generated by the equation of motion, using improvised values for resistance and elastance obtained noninvasively. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational study in intensive care units in five European centers. PATIENTS: We studied 21 stable patients instrumented with esophageal/gastric catheters for a previous study and ventilated alternately with pressure support (PSV) and proportional assist (PAV) ventilation with a Tyco 840 ventilator. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Previously recorded digital files were analyzed in real-time by a prototype incorporating the new technology (PVI monitor, YRT, Winnipeg, Canada). Actual onsets (P(DI)-T(ONSET)) and ends (P(DI)-T(END)) of inspiratory efforts, ineffective efforts, and patient respiratory rate were identified visually from transdiaphragmatic or calculated respiratory muscle pressure. Monitor-identified T(ONSET) occurred 0.107 +/- 0.074 s after P(DI)-T(ONSET), substantially less than trigger delay observed with conventional triggering (0.326 +/- 0.086 s). End of effort was identified 0.097 +/- 0.096 s after P(DI)-T(END), significantly less than actual cycling-off delay during PSV (0.486 +/- 0.307 s) or PAV (0.277 +/- 0.084 s). The monitor detected 80% of ineffective efforts. There was excellent agreement between monitor-estimated respiratory rate and actual patient rate over a wide range (17-59/min) of patient rates (mean (+/- SD) of difference -0.2 +/- 1.9/min for pressure support and 0.2 +/- 0.9/min for proportional assist) even when large discrepancies existed (> 35/min) between patient and ventilator rates. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed approach should make it possible to improve patient-ventilator interaction and to obtain accurate estimates of true patient respiratory rate when there is nonsynchrony.
Authors: Arnaud W Thille; Pablo Rodriguez; Belen Cabello; François Lellouche; Laurent Brochard Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-08-01 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: L Appendini; A Patessio; S Zanaboni; M Carone; B Gukov; C F Donner; A Rossi Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1994-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Lluis Blanch; Bernat Sales; Jaume Montanya; Umberto Lucangelo; Oscar Garcia-Esquirol; Ana Villagra; Encarna Chacon; Anna Estruga; Massimo Borelli; Ma Jose Burgueño; Joan C Oliva; Rafael Fernandez; Jesus Villar; Robert Kacmarek; Gastón Murias Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Karen G Mellott; Mary Jo Grap; Cindy L Munro; Curtis N Sessler; Paul A Wetzel; Jon O Nilsestuen; Jessica M Ketchum Journal: Heart Lung Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.210