OBJECTIVE: To collect information on clinical practice and current management strategies in 22 Italian neurosurgical hospitals for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational 6-month study for prospective data collection. PATIENTS: 350 cases of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Each center enrolled from 4-36 patients. Neurological deterioration (24%) was more frequent in patients with higher Fisher classification, and with pretreatment rebleeding and it was associated with an unfavorable outcome (46%, 36/78, vs. 33%, 83/251). Aneurysms were mainly secured by clipping (55%, 191/350). An endovascular approach was utilized in 35% (121/350). The more frequent medical complications were fever, recorded in one-half of cases, pneumonia (18%), sodium disturbances (hyponatremia 22%, hypernatremia 17%), cardiopulmonary events as neurogenic pulmonary edema (4%) and myocardial ischemia (5%). Intracranial hypertension was experienced in one-third of the patients, followed by hydrocephalus (29%) and vasospasm (30%). Cerebral ischemia was found in an about one-quarter of the cohort. To identify the independent predictors of outcome we developed a model in which the dichotomized Glasgow Outcome Scale was tested as function of extracranial and intracranial complications. Only high intracranial pressure and deterioration in neurological status were independent factors related to unfavorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that in every step of care there is extreme heterogeneity among centers. These patients are complex, with comorbidities, immediate risk of rebleeding, and delayed risk of intracranial and medical complications. Following SAH early treatment and careful intensive care management requires the careful coordination of the various clinical specialties.
OBJECTIVE: To collect information on clinical practice and current management strategies in 22 Italian neurosurgical hospitals for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational 6-month study for prospective data collection. PATIENTS: 350 cases of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Each center enrolled from 4-36 patients. Neurological deterioration (24%) was more frequent in patients with higher Fisher classification, and with pretreatment rebleeding and it was associated with an unfavorable outcome (46%, 36/78, vs. 33%, 83/251). Aneurysms were mainly secured by clipping (55%, 191/350). An endovascular approach was utilized in 35% (121/350). The more frequent medical complications were fever, recorded in one-half of cases, pneumonia (18%), sodium disturbances (hyponatremia 22%, hypernatremia 17%), cardiopulmonary events as neurogenic pulmonary edema (4%) and myocardial ischemia (5%). Intracranial hypertension was experienced in one-third of the patients, followed by hydrocephalus (29%) and vasospasm (30%). Cerebral ischemia was found in an about one-quarter of the cohort. To identify the independent predictors of outcome we developed a model in which the dichotomized Glasgow Outcome Scale was tested as function of extracranial and intracranial complications. Only high intracranial pressure and deterioration in neurological status were independent factors related to unfavorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that in every step of care there is extreme heterogeneity among centers. These patients are complex, with comorbidities, immediate risk of rebleeding, and delayed risk of intracranial and medical complications. Following SAH early treatment and careful intensive care management requires the careful coordination of the various clinical specialties.
Authors: DeWitte T Cross; David L Tirschwell; Mary Ann Clark; Dan Tuden; Colin P Derdeyn; Christopher J Moran; Ralph G Dacey Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Katja E Wartenberg; J Michael Schmidt; Jan Claassen; Richard E Temes; Jennifer A Frontera; Noeleen Ostapkovich; Augusto Parra; E Sander Connolly; Stephan A Mayer Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: N J Solenski; E C Haley; N F Kassell; G Kongable; T Germanson; L Truskowski; J C Torner Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Andrew J Molyneux; Richard S C Kerr; Ly-Mee Yu; Mike Clarke; Mary Sneade; Julia A Yarnold; Peter Sandercock Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Sep 3-9 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Elisa R Zanier; Giovanna Brandi; Giuseppe Peri; Luca Longhi; Tommaso Zoerle; Mauro Tettamanti; Cecilia Garlanda; Anna Sigurtà; Serenella Valaperta; Alberto Mantovani; Maria Grazia De Simoni; Nino Stocchetti Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-11-12 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Petri Kuusinen; Tero Ala-Kokko; Airi Jartti; Lauri Ahvenjarvi; Pirjo Saynajakangas; Pasi Ohtonen; Hannu Syrjala Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Serge Marbacher; Volker Neuschmelting; Thilo Graupner; Stephan M Jakob; Javier Fandino Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-01-24 Impact factor: 17.440