MOTIVATION: Many classifications of protein function such as Gene Ontology (GO) are organized in directed acyclic graph (DAG) structures. In these classifications, the proteins are terminal leaf nodes; the categories 'above' them are functional annotations at various levels of specialization and the computation of a numerical measure of relatedness between two arbitrary proteins is an important proteomics problem. Moreover, analogous problems are important in other contexts in large-scale information organization--e.g. the Wikipedia online encyclopedia and the Yahoo and DMOZ web page classification schemes. RESULTS: Here we develop a simple probabilistic approach for computing this relatedness quantity, which we call the total ancestry method. Our measure is based on counting the number of leaf nodes that share exactly the same set of 'higher up' category nodes in comparison to the total number of classified pairs (i.e. the chance for the same total ancestry). We show such a measure is associated with a power-law distribution, allowing for the quick assessment of the statistical significance of shared functional annotations. We formally compare it with other quantitative functional similarity measures (such as, shortest path within a DAG, lowest common ancestor shared and Azuaje's information-theoretic similarity) and provide concrete metrics to assess differences. Finally, we provide a practical implementation for our total ancestry measure for GO and the MIPS functional catalog and give two applications of it in specific functional genomics contexts. AVAILABILITY: The implementations and results are available through our supplementary website at: http://gersteinlab.org/proj/funcsim. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: Many classifications of protein function such as Gene Ontology (GO) are organized in directed acyclic graph (DAG) structures. In these classifications, the proteins are terminal leaf nodes; the categories 'above' them are functional annotations at various levels of specialization and the computation of a numerical measure of relatedness between two arbitrary proteins is an important proteomics problem. Moreover, analogous problems are important in other contexts in large-scale information organization--e.g. the Wikipedia online encyclopedia and the Yahoo and DMOZ web page classification schemes. RESULTS: Here we develop a simple probabilistic approach for computing this relatedness quantity, which we call the total ancestry method. Our measure is based on counting the number of leaf nodes that share exactly the same set of 'higher up' category nodes in comparison to the total number of classified pairs (i.e. the chance for the same total ancestry). We show such a measure is associated with a power-law distribution, allowing for the quick assessment of the statistical significance of shared functional annotations. We formally compare it with other quantitative functional similarity measures (such as, shortest path within a DAG, lowest common ancestor shared and Azuaje's information-theoretic similarity) and provide concrete metrics to assess differences. Finally, we provide a practical implementation for our total ancestry measure for GO and the MIPS functional catalog and give two applications of it in specific functional genomics contexts. AVAILABILITY: The implementations and results are available through our supplementary website at: http://gersteinlab.org/proj/funcsim. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Yu Guo; Xiaomu Wei; Jishnu Das; Andrew Grimson; Steven M Lipkin; Andrew G Clark; Haiyuan Yu Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Adam J Richards; Brian Muller; Matthew Shotwell; L Ashley Cowart; Bäerbel Rohrer; Xinghua Lu Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Julja Burchard; Chunsheng Zhang; Angela M Liu; Ronnie T P Poon; Nikki P Y Lee; Kwong-Fai Wong; Pak C Sham; Brian Y Lam; Mark D Ferguson; George Tokiwa; Ryan Smith; Brendan Leeson; Rebecca Beard; John R Lamb; Lee Lim; Mao Mao; Hongyue Dai; John M Luk Journal: Mol Syst Biol Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 11.429
Authors: Haiyuan Yu; Pascal Braun; Muhammed A Yildirim; Irma Lemmens; Kavitha Venkatesan; Julie Sahalie; Tomoko Hirozane-Kishikawa; Fana Gebreab; Na Li; Nicolas Simonis; Tong Hao; Jean-François Rual; Amélie Dricot; Alexei Vazquez; Ryan R Murray; Christophe Simon; Leah Tardivo; Stanley Tam; Nenad Svrzikapa; Changyu Fan; Anne-Sophie de Smet; Adriana Motyl; Michael E Hudson; Juyong Park; Xiaofeng Xin; Michael E Cusick; Troy Moore; Charlie Boone; Michael Snyder; Frederick P Roth; Albert-László Barabási; Jan Tavernier; David E Hill; Marc Vidal Journal: Science Date: 2008-08-21 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sebastian Köhler; Marcel H Schulz; Peter Krawitz; Sebastian Bauer; Sandra Dölken; Claus E Ott; Christine Mundlos; Denise Horn; Stefan Mundlos; Peter N Robinson Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 11.025