Literature DB >> 17540349

Interactions between higher and lower visual areas improve shape selectivity of higher level neurons-explaining crowding phenomena.

Janneke F M Jehee1, Pieter R Roelfsema, Gustavo Deco, Jaap M J Murre, Victor A F Lamme.   

Abstract

Recent theories of visual perception propose that feedforward cortical processing enables rapid and automatic object categorizations, yet incorporates a limited amount of detail. Subsequent feedback processing highlights high-resolution representations in early visual areas and provides spatial detail. To verify this hypothesis, we separate the contributions of feedforward and feedback signals to the selectivity of cortical neurons in a neural network simulation that is modeled after the hierarchical feedforward-feedback organization of cortical areas. We find that in such a network the responses of high-level neurons can initially distinguish between low-resolution aspects of objects but are 'blind' to differences in detail. After several feedback-feedforward cycles of processing, however, they can also distinguish between objects that differ in detail. Moreover, we find that our model captures recent paradoxical results of crowding phenomena, showing that spatial detail that is lost in visual crowding is nevertheless able to evoke specific adaptation effects. Our results thus provide an existence proof of the feasibility of novel theoretical models and provide a mechanism to explain various psychophysical and physiological results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17540349     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  16 in total

1.  Local sensitivity to stimulus orientation and spatial frequency within the receptive fields of neurons in visual area 2 of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  X Tao; B Zhang; E L Smith; S Nishimoto; I Ohzawa; Y M Chino
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Why do we see what's not there?

Authors:  Jacob Jolij; Maaike Meurs; Erwin Haitel
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-11-01

Review 3.  Cortical high-density counterstream architectures.

Authors:  Kenneth Knoblauch; Zoltán Toroczkai; Henry Kennedy; Nikola T Markov; Mária Ercsey-Ravasz; David C Van Essen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The effect of decreased interletter spacing on orthographic processing.

Authors:  Veronica Montani; Andrea Facoetti; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

5.  Selective Modulation of Early Visual Cortical Activity by Movement Intention.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Craig S Chapman; Daniel J Gale; J Randall Flanagan; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Contributions of magno- and parvocellular channels to conscious and non-conscious vision.

Authors:  Bruno G Breitmeyer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Feed-forward segmentation of figure-ground and assignment of border-ownership.

Authors:  Hans Supèr; August Romeo; Matthias Keil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predictive feedback can account for biphasic responses in the lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Janneke F M Jehee; Dana H Ballard
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Feedback of visual object information to foveal retinotopic cortex.

Authors:  Mark A Williams; Chris I Baker; Hans P Op de Beeck; Won Mok Shim; Sabin Dang; Christina Triantafyllou; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Probing the neural basis of perceptual phenomenology with the touch-induced visual illusion.

Authors:  Philip Servos; Allison Boyd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.