Literature DB >> 17539183

Cage allocation designs for rodent carcinogenicity experiments.

A M Herzberg, S W Lagakos.   

Abstract

Cage allocation designs for rodent carcinogenicity experiments are discussed and presented with the goal of avoiding dosage group biases related to cage location. Considerations in selecting a cage design are first discussed in general terms. Specific designs are presented for use in experiments involving three, four, and five dose groups and with one, four, and five rodents per cage. Priorities for balancing treatment groups include horizontal position on shelf and shelf of rack, nearest neighbor balance, and male-female balance. It is proposed that these balance criteria be considered together with practical issues, such as the ability to accurately conform to a design and to determine a sensible and efficient design for each experiment.

Year:  1991        PMID: 17539183      PMCID: PMC1568241          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9196199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  11 in total

1.  The impact of treatment allocation procedures on nominal significance levels and bias.

Authors:  L A Kalish; C B Begg
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1987-06

2.  Toxicology studies. II. The laboratory animal.

Authors:  J G Fox; P Thibert; D L Arnold; D R Krewski; H C Grice
Journal:  Food Cosmet Toxicol       Date:  1979-12

3.  Statistical issues in interpretation of chronic bioassay tests for carcinogenicity.

Authors:  J J Gart; K C Chu; R E Tarone
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Optimal design of the chronic animal bioassay.

Authors:  C Portier; D Hoel
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1983-07

5.  Design of animal carcinogenicity studies for goodness-of-fit of multistage models.

Authors:  C J Portier; D G Hoel
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1984-12

6.  The effect of stratified randomization on size and power of statistical tests in clinical trials.

Authors:  S B Green; D P Byar
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1978

7.  In utero exposure in chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity studies.

Authors:  H C Grice; I C Munro; D R Krewski; I C Munro; D R Krewski; H Blumenthal
Journal:  Food Cosmet Toxicol       Date:  1981-06

8.  Dietary seaweed (Laminaria) and mammary carcinogenesis in rats.

Authors:  J Teas; M L Harbison; R S Gelman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Association between cage shelf level and spontaneous and induced neoplasms in mice.

Authors:  D L Greenman; R L Kodell; W G Sheldon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Statistical issues in the design, analysis and interpretation of animal carcinogenicity studies.

Authors:  J K Haseman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  A glass full of optimism: enrichment effects on cognitive bias in a rat model of depression.

Authors:  Sophie Helene Richter; Anita Schick; Carolin Hoyer; Katja Lankisch; Peter Gass; Barbara Vollmayr
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Effect of population heterogenization on the reproducibility of mouse behavior: a multi-laboratory study.

Authors:  S Helene Richter; Joseph P Garner; Benjamin Zipser; Lars Lewejohann; Norbert Sachser; Chadi Touma; Britta Schindler; Sabine Chourbaji; Christiane Brandwein; Peter Gass; Niek van Stipdonk; Johanneke van der Harst; Berry Spruijt; Vootele Võikar; David P Wolfer; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Where have I been? Where should I go? Spatial working memory on a radial arm maze in a rat model of depression.

Authors:  Sophie Helene Richter; Benjamin Zeuch; Katja Lankisch; Peter Gass; Daniel Durstewitz; Barbara Vollmayr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.