OBJECTIVES: We examined the hypothesis that paired inspiratory/expiratory computed tomography (CT) scans in a limited-lung area that excludes emphysema may provide a more accurate evaluation of peripheral airway obstruction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with emphysema. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 32 patients with COPD. The cross-sectional area between -500 and -1024 HU was segmented as whole-lung. The relative areas (RA) less than -950 HU for the whole-lung (RA<-950) were segmented as emphysema, and pixels less than -900 HU for the whole-lung (RA<-900) were segmented to evaluate air trapping. Next, the cross-sectional area between -500 and -950 HU that excludes emphysema was segmented as limited-lung, and pixels between -900 and -950 HU for the limited-lung (RA900-950) were segmented. The changes in RA<-900 (RA<-900-change) and RA900-950 (RA900-950-change) between inspiration and expiration were calculated. Correlations between CT measurements and the results of pulmonary function tests (PFT) were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the mean inspiratory RA<-950 and expiratory RA<-950 (P = 0.245), but the mean expiratory RA900-950 decreased significantly compared with the mean inspiratory RA900-950 (P < 0.001). The correlation coefficients between PFT parameters and the RA900-900-change in the limited-lung without emphysema were higher than that of the RA<-900-change in the whole-lung. CONCLUSIONS: The paired inspiratory/expiratory CT measurements in the limited-lung without emphysema correlated more closely with the PFTs. Our observations suggest that paired inspiratory/expiratory CT scans in the limited-lung excluding emphysema are sensitive for the evaluation of airway obstruction in COPD with emphysema.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the hypothesis that paired inspiratory/expiratory computed tomography (CT) scans in a limited-lung area that excludes emphysema may provide a more accurate evaluation of peripheral airway obstruction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with emphysema. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 32 patients with COPD. The cross-sectional area between -500 and -1024 HU was segmented as whole-lung. The relative areas (RA) less than -950 HU for the whole-lung (RA<-950) were segmented as emphysema, and pixels less than -900 HU for the whole-lung (RA<-900) were segmented to evaluate air trapping. Next, the cross-sectional area between -500 and -950 HU that excludes emphysema was segmented as limited-lung, and pixels between -900 and -950 HU for the limited-lung (RA900-950) were segmented. The changes in RA<-900 (RA<-900-change) and RA900-950 (RA900-950-change) between inspiration and expiration were calculated. Correlations between CT measurements and the results of pulmonary function tests (PFT) were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the mean inspiratory RA<-950 and expiratory RA<-950 (P = 0.245), but the mean expiratory RA900-950 decreased significantly compared with the mean inspiratory RA900-950 (P < 0.001). The correlation coefficients between PFT parameters and the RA900-900-change in the limited-lung without emphysema were higher than that of the RA<-900-change in the whole-lung. CONCLUSIONS: The paired inspiratory/expiratory CT measurements in the limited-lung without emphysema correlated more closely with the PFTs. Our observations suggest that paired inspiratory/expiratory CT scans in the limited-lung excluding emphysema are sensitive for the evaluation of airway obstruction in COPD with emphysema.
Authors: Joyce D Schroeder; Alexander S McKenzie; Jordan A Zach; Carla G Wilson; Douglas Curran-Everett; Douglas S Stinson; John D Newell; David A Lynch Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Esther Pompe; Craig J Galbán; Brian D Ross; Leo Koenderman; Nick Ht Ten Hacken; Dirkje S Postma; Maarten van den Berge; Pim A de Jong; Jan-Willem J Lammers; Firdaus Aa Mohamed Hoesein Journal: Respir Med Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: S Rizzo; L Preda; S Raimondi; S Meroni; M Belmonte; L Monfardini; G Veronesi; M Bellomi Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Thomas K Pilgram; James D Quirk; Andrew J Bierhals; Roger D Yusen; Stephen S Lefrak; Joel D Cooper; David S Gierada Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Jordan Alexander Zach; John D Newell; Joyce Schroeder; James R Murphy; Douglas Curran-Everett; Eric A Hoffman; Philip M Westgate; MeiLan K Han; Edwin K Silverman; James D Crapo; David A Lynch Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Tsuneo Yamashiro; Shin Matsuoka; Brian J Bartholmai; Raúl San José Estépar; James C Ross; Alejandro Diaz; Sadayuki Murayama; Edwin K Silverman; Hiroto Hatabu; George R Washko Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 3.173