Literature DB >> 17537499

Neurology of affective prosody and its functional-anatomic organization in right hemisphere.

Elliott D Ross1, Marilee Monnot.   

Abstract

Unlike the aphasic syndromes, the organization of affective prosody in brain has remained controversial because affective-prosodic deficits may occur after left or right brain damage. However, different patterns of deficits are observed following left and right brain damage that suggest affective prosody is a dominant and lateralized function of the right hemisphere. Using the Aprosodia Battery, which was developed to differentiate left and right hemisphere patterns of affective-prosodic deficits, functional-anatomic evidence is presented in patients with focal ischemic strokes to support the concepts that (1) affective prosody is a dominant and lateralized function of the right hemisphere, (2) the intrahemispheric organization of affective prosody in the right hemisphere, with the partial exception of Repetition, is analogous to the organization of propositional language in the left hemisphere and (3) the aprosodic syndromes are cortically based as part of evolutionary adaptations underlying human language and communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17537499     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  70 in total

1.  Lateralization of face processing in the human brain.

Authors:  Ming Meng; Tharian Cherian; Gaurav Singal; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Stone tools, language and the brain in human evolution.

Authors:  Dietrich Stout; Thierry Chaminade
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Humans mimicking animals: a cortical hierarchy for human vocal communication sounds.

Authors:  William J Talkington; Kristina M Rapuano; Laura A Hitt; Chris A Frum; James W Lewis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Mismatch negativity to tonal contours suggests preattentive perception of prosodic content.

Authors:  David I Leitman; Pejman Sehatpour; Marina Shpaner; John J Foxe; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.978

5.  Sing that tune: infants' perception of melody and lyrics and the facilitation of phonetic recognition in songs.

Authors:  Gina C Lebedeva; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2010-05-15

6.  Neural correlates of efficacy of voice therapy in Parkinson's disease identified by performance-correlation analysis.

Authors:  Shalini Narayana; Peter T Fox; Wei Zhang; Crystal Franklin; Donald A Robin; Deanie Vogel; Lorraine O Ramig
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Categorical learning revealed in activity pattern of left fusiform cortex.

Authors:  Jessica E Goold; Ming Meng
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Using prosody during sentence processing in aphasia: Evidence from temporal neural dynamics.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Tracy Love; Katherine J Midgley; Lewis P Shapiro; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Prosodic abnormalities in schizotypal personality disorder.

Authors:  Chandlee C Dickey; Mai-Anh T Vu; Martina M Voglmaier; Margaret A Niznikiewicz; Robert W McCarley; Lawrence P Panych
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  "It's Not What You Say, But How You Say it": A Reciprocal Temporo-frontal Network for Affective Prosody.

Authors:  David I Leitman; Daniel H Wolf; J Daniel Ragland; Petri Laukka; James Loughead; Jeffrey N Valdez; Daniel C Javitt; Bruce I Turetsky; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.