Literature DB >> 17537467

Anogenital distance predicts female choice and male potency in prairie voles.

Alexander G Ophir1, Javier Delbarco-Trillo.   

Abstract

Anogenital distance (AGD) in rodents is a useful indicator of masculinization or feminization due to prenatal hormonal effects. If such cues convey useful information about both 'maleness' and more importantly mate quality, then females may select males based on this cue or other cues related to it. We tested this hypothesis by asking if female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) preferred males with relatively longer AGDs and if AGD correlated with fitness enhancing characteristics such as sperm count, sperm size, and gonad size. Not only did preferred males have significantly longer AGD and larger testes than nonpreferred males, but AGD was directly related to the testes size, seminal vesicle size, and the number of sperm stored. We re-evaluated data collected in semi-natural field enclosures and discovered that males that were members of a pairbond had longer AGD than single males. This later result, taken under semi-natural conditions, was consistent with results we obtained in the laboratory. Taken together these data indicate that AGD serves as a useful cue of male potency and that females preferentially associate with males that demonstrate this masculinized phenotype. Moreover, these data imply that females may select mates based on their potential to effectively fertilize ova, a potentially important trait for a species that forms life-long pairbonds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17537467     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  8 in total

1.  The phenotypic correlates and quantitative genetics of masculinization in the rodent, Octodon degus.

Authors:  D A Roff; M E Wolak; L A Correa; M Soto-Gamboa
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Voluntary exercise facilitates pair-bonding in male prairie voles.

Authors:  William M Kenkel; C Sue Carter
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  A preference to bond? Male prairie voles form pair bonds even in the presence of multiple receptive females.

Authors:  Tomica D Blocker; Alexander G Ophir
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Variation in neural V1aR predicts sexual fidelity and space use among male prairie voles in semi-natural settings.

Authors:  Alexander G Ophir; Jerry O Wolff; Steven M Phelps
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Social recognition in paired but not single male prairie voles.

Authors:  Tomica D Blocker; Alexander G Ophir
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Digit ratio, a proposed marker of the prenatal hormone environment, is not associated with prenatal sex steroids, anogenital distance, or gender-typed play behavior in preschool age children.

Authors:  Emily Barrett; Sally W Thurston; Donald Harrington; Nicole R Bush; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Ruby Nguyen; Alexis Zavez; Christina Wang; Shanna Swan
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.034

Review 7.  Multi-Level Effects Driving Cognitive and Behavioral Variability among Prairie Voles: Insights into Reproductive Decision-Making from Biological Levels of Organization.

Authors:  Santiago A Forero; Alexander G Ophir
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 1.919

8.  Motivational Drive in Non-copulating and Socially Monogamous Mammals.

Authors:  Wendy Portillo; Raúl G Paredes
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.558

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.