Literature DB >> 17537378

Interpretative comments on autoantibody tests.

Elio Tonutti1, Daniela Visentini, Nicola Bizzaro.   

Abstract

Immunology laboratories perform diagnostic tests to identify the autoantibody markers needed to classify disorders which are complex, often rare, and hard to define. The recent introduction of new markers and the use of increasingly complicated assay procedures can cause difficulty in interpreting test results. Moreover, during the performance of some tests, some autoantibodies which were not requested, and consequently not expected, may be identified by chance. It is advisable for these positive results to be reported only when they have a high predictive value and suggest the possible presence of an autoimmune disease. An interpretative comment on autoantibody test results is crucial in a number of cases: when autoantibodies with a significant clinical correlation (high specificity) are found; when two or more methods are used to determine the same autoantibody and the results disagree; when unexpected autoantibody positivity is found and in case of results generated by further diagnostic tests conducted by the laboratory on its own initiative. The interpretative comment should be based on the patient's personal characteristics (sex, age) and the other laboratory parameters available; it should specify the diagnostic accuracy of the assay methods used, the clinical and diagnostic correlations of the antibodies which tested positive, and any further tests needed to complete the diagnostic process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17537378     DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2007.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Autoimmun Rev        ISSN: 1568-9972            Impact factor:   9.754


  8 in total

1.  A proposed model for effective collaboration between rheumatologists and clinical pathologists for the diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Nicola Bizzaro; Gabriella Morozzi
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Cutting-edge issues in organ-specific autoimmunity.

Authors:  M Eric Gershwin; Yehuda Shoenfeld
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.667

3.  The future of autoimmunity.

Authors:  Yehuda Shoenfeld
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.667

4.  Mechanisms and pathophysiology of autoimmune disease.

Authors:  Wesley H Brooks
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 8.667

5.  Explosion of autoimmune diseases and the mosaic of old and novel factors.

Authors:  Nancy Agmon-Levin; Zhexiong Lian; Yehuda Shoenfeld
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 11.530

Review 6.  Autoimmunity and environment: am I at risk?

Authors:  Daniel Smyk; Eirini I Rigopoulou; Harold Baum; Andrew K Burroughs; Diego Vergani; Dimitrios P Bogdanos
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.667

7.  The ANA-reflex test as a model for improving clinical appropriateness in autoimmune diagnostics.

Authors:  Elio Tonutti; Nicola Bizzaro; Gabriella Morozzi; Antonella Radice; Luigi Cinquanta; Danilo Villalta; Renato Tozzoli; Marilina Tampoia; Brunetta Porcelli; Martina Fabris; Ignazio Brusca; Maria Grazia Alessio; Giuseppina Barberio; Maria Concetta Sorrentino; Antonio Antico; Danila Bassetti; Desré Ethel Fontana; Tiziana Imbastaro; Daniela Visentini; Giampaola Pesce; Marcello Bagnasco
Journal:  Auto Immun Highlights       Date:  2016-07-16

8.  Clinical Laboratories - Production Factories or Specialized Diagnostic Centers.

Authors:  János Kappelmayer; Judit Tóth
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2016-04-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.