Literature DB >> 17537377

Recent advances in diagnostic technologies and their impact in autoimmune diseases.

Renato Tozzoli1.   

Abstract

Conventional immunological methods for the detection of serum autoantibodies have been an essential tool for the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases for 40 years: in the last decade autoantibody tests have become accepted criteria for the diagnosis and classification of the main systemic and organ-specific autoimmune diseases. The high degree of purification reached by the autoantigens used in these methods has allowed high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, especially in the case of some new autoantibodies of particular clinical significance, such as anti-nucleosome, anti-transglutaminase, anti-TSH receptor and anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies. In the last 5 years the advent of proteomic technology, which allows the simultaneous measurement of a number of autoantibodies (multiplexing), has opened up new horizons in the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases. Multiplexing is particularly interesting for clinical laboratories, for organisational, logistical/managerial, physiopathological and research reasons. The emerging technologies are represented by systems based on planar or non-planar (suspension) arrays: the latter include methods which use addressable microbeads or nanobarcoded particles. Within a few years, the new methods will allow testing of individual autoantibody profiles, which will probably improve understanding of the physiopathology of autoimmunity, allow early diagnosis (due to the predictive value of autoantibodies), and drive the diffusion of antigen-specific therapies in autoimmune diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17537377     DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2007.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Autoimmun Rev        ISSN: 1568-9972            Impact factor:   9.754


  8 in total

Review 1.  Understanding Human Autoimmunity and Autoinflammation Through Transcriptomics.

Authors:  Romain Banchereau; Alma-Martina Cepika; Jacques Banchereau; Virginia Pascual
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 28.527

Review 2.  Myositis-specific autoantibodies: detection and clinical associations.

Authors:  Sander H J van Dooren; Walther J van Venrooij; Ger J M Pruijn
Journal:  Auto Immun Highlights       Date:  2011-03-23

Review 3.  Recent Approaches To Optimize Laboratory Assessment of Antinuclear Antibodies.

Authors:  Anne E Tebo
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2017-12-05

4.  Current Techniques to Accurately Measure Anti-retinal Autoantibodies.

Authors:  Grazyna Adamus
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-12

5.  Automation in indirect immunofluorescence testing: a new step in the evolution of the autoimmunology laboratory.

Authors:  Renato Tozzoli; Antonio Antico; Brunetta Porcelli; Danila Bassetti
Journal:  Auto Immun Highlights       Date:  2012-07-13

6.  Routine use of Zenit RA, a novel chemiluminescent immunoanalyzer in autoimmune disease diagnosis.

Authors:  P Ghillani; L Dufat; S Himeur; M Miyara; Z Amoura; L Musset
Journal:  Auto Immun Highlights       Date:  2012-03-21

7.  Automation, consolidation, and integration in autoimmune diagnostics.

Authors:  Renato Tozzoli; Federica D'Aurizio; Danilo Villalta; Nicola Bizzaro
Journal:  Auto Immun Highlights       Date:  2015-07-03

Review 8.  Next-Generation Autoantibody Testing by Combination of Screening and Confirmation-the CytoBead® Technology.

Authors:  Mandy Sowa; Rico Hiemann; Peter Schierack; Dirk Reinhold; Karsten Conrad; Dirk Roggenbuck
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 8.667

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.