Literature DB >> 17537116

Preferences of patients, doctors, and nurses regarding wound dressing characteristics: a conjoint analysis.

Hester Vermeulen1, Dirk T Ubbink, Femke de Zwart, Astrid Goossens, Rien de Vos.   

Abstract

The different choices doctors, nurses, and patients make regarding wound dressing materials are generally based on personal preferences, because strong evidence and guidelines on local wound care for open wounds are lacking. We studied which attributes of a wound dressing doctors, nurses, and patients consider the most important. A conjoint analysis questionnaire comprising paper-based descriptions with six attributes, and questions regarding the willingness-to-pay for these attributes were sent out to surgical patients, (assistant)-surgeons and nurses. Preferences for wound dressing attributes were similar for doctors (n=50), nurses (n=150), and patients (n=74). Pain during dressing changes, duration of hospitalization, and wound healing time were ranked highest. Doctors would spend more money on a shorter hospitalization, nurses on pain reduction, and patients on quicker wound healing. Patients were willing to pay a relatively small monthly amount out of pocket for a dressing that would result in a quicker and less-painful wound healing. Doctors, nurses, and patients prefer similar attributes of wound dressing materials, but differ in their willingness-to-pay. To achieve a more consistent local wound care, clinical decision-making should be in accordance with these preferences. These should also be the focus for manufacturers and researchers to obtain more evidence on which materials best match these attributes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17537116     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00230.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  11 in total

Review 1.  A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.

Authors:  Inger M Janssen; Ansgar Gerhardus; Milly A Schröer-Günther; Fülöp Scheibler
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Severe pain during wound care procedures: A cross-sectional study protocol.

Authors:  Catherine A Fiala; Linda I Abbott; Cheryl D Carter; Stephen L Hillis; Jessica S Wolf; Meghan Schuster; Rachel Dulski; Elizabeth A Grice; Barbara A Rakel; Sue E Gardner
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  What Do Patients Want? Patient Preference in Wound Care.

Authors:  Lisa Q Corbett; William J Ennis
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Wound bed preparation: TIME for an update.

Authors:  Rhiannon L Harries; David C Bosanquet; Keith G Harding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Grafting both acute wound site and adjacent donor site with the same graft: an easy and safe procedure to improve healing and minimize pain in elderly and bedridden patients.

Authors:  C Keilani; D Agard; A Duhoux; A Lakhel; O Giraud; M Brachet; P Duhamel; E Bey
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2017-03-31

Review 6.  Minimising wound-related pain at dressing change: evidence-informed practice.

Authors:  Kevin Y Woo; Keith Harding; Patricia Price; Gary Sibbald
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  Does evidence permeate all surgical areas equally? Publication trends in wound care compared to breast cancer care: a longitudinal trend analysis.

Authors:  F E Brölmann; M D Groenewold; R Spijker; J A van der Hage; D T Ubbink; H Vermeulen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anne M Eskes; Fleur E Brölmann; Louise A A Gerbens; Dirk T Ubbink; Hester Vermeulen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Three donor site dressings in pediatric split-thickness skin grafts: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Craig A McBride; Roy M Kimble; Kellie Stockton
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Prospective randomised controlled trial of Algisite™ M, Cuticerin™, and Sorbact® as donor site dressings in paediatric split-thickness skin grafts.

Authors:  Craig A McBride; Roy M Kimble; Kellie A Stockton
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2018-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.