Literature DB >> 17536884

Renal safety of intravenous ibandronic Acid in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease.

Nina V Lyubimova1, Nikolay E Kushlinsky, Michail R Lichinitser, Karl Schlosser.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Renal adverse events are a troublesome complication of bisphosphonate therapy. This study investigated the effect of intravenous ibandronic acid (ibandronate) treatment on renal function in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease.
METHODS: 74 patients were randomised to double-blind (but not dose-blind) treatment with bolus injections of ibandronic acid 2mg (n = 23), 1-hour infusions of ibandronic acid 6mg (n = 28), or placebo injections or infusions (n = 23). According to randomisation, patients received either three injections or three infusions over the 3-month period, one at the start and two subsequent doses at 4-weekly intervals. Measurements of urinary excretion of total protein, albumin, alpha(1)-microglobulin, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, haematuria and serum creatinine were performed before, during and after treatment.
RESULTS: Treatment with ibandronic acid was not associated with impairment of renal function; the renal safety profiles of ibandronic acid 2 and 6mg were similar to that of placebo. Assessments of proteinuria, haematuria, enzymuria and serum creatinine indicated that there were no statistically significant changes between pre- and post-treatment levels in patients receiving ibandronic acid 2 or 6mg or between patients receiving ibandronic acid or placebo. Urine parameters varied during treatment in the same range with approximately similar frequency in the ibandronic acid and placebo groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Short-term administration of intravenous ibandronic acid did not impair renal function in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease. Because tolerability profiles vary between bisphosphonates, the lack of renal toxicity with ibandronic acid makes the drug an attractive treatment option for metastatic bone disease.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 17536884     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200323110-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  27 in total

1.  Renal failure associated with intravenous diphosphonates.

Authors:  H M Bounameaux; J Schifferli; J P Montani; A Jung; F Chatelanat
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-02-26       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Effects of intravenous diphosphonates on renal function.

Authors:  J A Kanis; C J Preston; A J Yates; R C Percival; K I Mundy; R G Russell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-06-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Urinary enzymes, nephrotoxicity and renal disease.

Authors:  R G Price
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 4.  Comparative tolerability of drug therapies for hypercalcaemia of malignancy.

Authors:  N Zojer; A V Keck; M Pecherstorfer
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  A diagnostic programme for quantitative analysis of proteinuria.

Authors:  W Hofmann; W G Guder
Journal:  J Clin Chem Clin Biochem       Date:  1989-09

6.  Acute intravenous infusion of disodium dihydrogen (1-hydroxyethylidene)diphosphonate: mechanism of toxicity.

Authors:  M D Francis; C L Slough
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Estimation of ifosfamide/cisplatinum-induced renal toxicity by urinary protein analysis.

Authors:  R M Rossi; C Kist; U Wurster; W R Külpmann; J H Ehrich
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 8.  Esophagitis associated with the use of alendronate.

Authors:  P C de Groen; D F Lubbe; L J Hirsch; A Daifotis; W Stephenson; D Freedholm; S Pryor-Tillotson; M J Seleznick; H Pinkas; K K Wang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Diagnostic strategies in urinalysis.

Authors:  W Hofmann; C Regenbogen; H Edel; W G Guder
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 10.545

10.  Intravenous ibandronate reduces the incidence of skeletal complications in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases.

Authors:  J-J Body; I J Diel; M R Lichinitser; E D Kreuser; W Dornoff; V A Gorbunova; M Budde; B Bergström
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Ibandronic acid: a review of its use in the treatment of bone metastases of breast cancer.

Authors:  Paul L McCormack; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Management of bone metastases in breast cancer.

Authors:  Allan Lipton
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-03

3.  Use of intravenous bisphosphonates in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Roberto Civitelli; Nicola Napoli; Reina Armamento-Villareal
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Risk of renal impairment after treatment with ibandronate versus zoledronic acid: a retrospective medical records review.

Authors:  Ingo J Diel; Rudolf Weide; Hubert Köppler; Lucia Antràs; Michael Smith; Jesse Green; Neil Wintfeld; Maureen Neary; Mei Sheng Duh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Safety considerations with bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  William Strampel; Ronald Emkey; Roberto Civitelli
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Intravenous bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Peyman Mottaghi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 7.  Collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis following long-term treatment with oral ibandronate: case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Ning Jia; Fionnuala C Cormack; Bin Xie; Zita Shiue; Behzad Najafian; Julie R Gralow
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.