BACKGROUND: The role offine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in diagnosis and differentiation of primary orbital lymphoid lesions is debatable, and little literature exists on cytodiagnosis of orbital lymphoid lesions. CASES: Four patients with orbital lesions underwent routine FNAC. In 3 cases, histopathologic examination was performed with immunohistochemistry (IHC). Cytologic features and diag- noses were correlated with histopathologic diagnoses. Two were cytologically diagnosed with low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 2 with pseudolymphoma and inflammatory pseudotumor, respectively. Of the 2 cases of histologically diagnosed NHL, 1 had concordant diagnosis and the other had a jalse negative diagnosis of pseudolymphoma; both showed significant increase in mast cells, with neoplastie lymphoid cells exhibiting a higher N:C ratio and coarser chromatin texture. The case cytologically interpreted as suspicious for NHL was identified as a psetedolymphoma on histology (false positive). The case of inflammatory pseudotumor, in which hiopiy was not peiformned, responded well to corticosteroids, strengthening the cytologic diagnosis. CONCLUSION: FNAC diagnosis and differentiation of benign vs. malignant primacy orbital lymphoid lesions is often difficult. Careful cytologic interpretation with respect to certain subtle cytologic details is needed in minimizing false positive or false negative diagnoses. In difficult situations, IHC using suitable immunomarkers proves highly useful.
BACKGROUND: The role offine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in diagnosis and differentiation of n class="Disease">primary orbital lymphoid lesions is debatable, and little literature exists on cytodiagnosis of orbital lymphoid lesions. CASES: Four patients with orbital lesions underwent routine FNAC. In 3 cases, histopathologic examination was performed with immunohistochemistry (IHC). Cytologic features and diag- noses were correlated with histopathologic diagnoses. Two were cytologically diagnosed with low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and 2 with pseudolymphoma and inflammatory pseudotumor, respectively. Of the 2 cases of histologically diagnosed NHL, 1 had concordant diagnosis and the other had a jalse negative diagnosis of pseudolymphoma; both showed significant increase in mast cells, with neoplastie lymphoid cells exhibiting a higher N:C ratio and coarser chromatin texture. The case cytologically interpreted as suspicious for NHL was identified as a psetedolymphoma on histology (false positive). The case of inflammatory pseudotumor, in which hiopiy was not peiformned, responded well to corticosteroids, strengthening the cytologic diagnosis. CONCLUSION: FNAC diagnosis and differentiation of benign vs. malignant primacy orbital lymphoid lesions is often difficult. Careful cytologic interpretation with respect to certain subtle cytologic details is needed in minimizing false positive or false negative diagnoses. In difficult situations, IHC using suitable immunomarkers proves highly useful.