OBJECTIVE: This study used a longitudinal design to investigate the buffering role of resilience on worsening HbA(1c) and self-care behaviours in the face of rising diabetes-related distress. METHOD: A total of 111 patients with diabetes completed surveys and had their glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) assessed at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Resilience was defined by a factor score of self-esteem, self-efficacy, self-mastery and optimism. Diabetes-related distress and self-care behaviours were also assessed. RESULTS: Baseline resilience, diabetes-related distress and their interaction predicted physical health (HbA(1c)) at 1 year. Patients with low, moderate and high resilience were identified. Those with low or moderate resilience levels showed a strong association between rising distress and worsening HbA(1c) across time (r=.57, .56, respectively). However, those with high resilience scores did not show the same associations (r=.08). Low resilience was also associated with fewer self-care behaviours when faced with increasing distress (r=-.55). These correlation coefficients remained significant after controlling for starting-points. CONCLUSION: In patients with diabetes, resilience resources predicted future HbA(1c) and buffered worsening HbA(1c) and self-care behaviours in the face of rising distress levels.
OBJECTIVE: This study used a longitudinal design to investigate the buffering role of resilience on worsening HbA(1c) and self-care behaviours in the face of rising diabetes-related distress. METHOD: A total of 111 patients with diabetes completed surveys and had their glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) assessed at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Resilience was defined by a factor score of self-esteem, self-efficacy, self-mastery and optimism. Diabetes-related distress and self-care behaviours were also assessed. RESULTS: Baseline resilience, diabetes-related distress and their interaction predicted physical health (HbA(1c)) at 1 year. Patients with low, moderate and high resilience were identified. Those with low or moderate resilience levels showed a strong association between rising distress and worsening HbA(1c) across time (r=.57, .56, respectively). However, those with high resilience scores did not show the same associations (r=.08). Low resilience was also associated with fewer self-care behaviours when faced with increasing distress (r=-.55). These correlation coefficients remained significant after controlling for starting-points. CONCLUSION: In patients with diabetes, resilience resources predicted future HbA(1c) and buffered worsening HbA(1c) and self-care behaviours in the face of rising distress levels.
Authors: Nicole C W Van Der Ven; Katie Weinger; Joyce Yi; Frans Pouwer; Herman Adèr; Henk M Van Der Ploeg; Frank J Snoek Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: W H Polonsky; B J Anderson; P A Lohrer; G Welch; A M Jacobson; J E Aponte; C E Schwartz Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Christina N Massey; Emily H Feig; Laura Duque-Serrano; Deborah Wexler; Judith Tedlie Moskowitz; Jeff C Huffman Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Minden B Sexton; Lindsay Hamilton; Ellen W McGinnis; Katherine L Rosenblum; Maria Muzik Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Joyce P Yi-Frazier; Ronald E Smith; Peter P Vitaliano; Jean C Yi; Scarlett Mai; Matthew Hillman; Katie Weinger Journal: Stress Health Date: 2010-01-01 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Christopher M Celano; Eleanor E Beale; Shannon V Moore; Deborah J Wexler; Jeff C Huffman Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: Abby R Rosenberg; Karen L Syrjala; Paul J Martin; Mary E Flowers; Paul A Carpenter; Rachel B Salit; K Scott Baker; Stephanie J Lee Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 6.860