Literature DB >> 17535464

Divergent thinking: strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects.

K J Gilhooly1, E Fioratou, S H Anthony, V Wynn.   

Abstract

Although the Alternative Uses divergent thinking task has been widely used in psychometric and experimental studies of creativity, the cognitive processes underlying this task have not been examined in detail before the two studies are reported here. In Experiment 1, a verbal protocol analysis study of the Alternative Uses task was carried out with a Think aloud group (N=40) and a Silent control group (N=64). The groups did not differ in fluency or novelty of idea production indicating no verbal overshadowing. Analysis of protocols from the Think aloud group suggested that initial responses were based on a strategy of Retrieval from long-term memory of pre-known uses. Later responses tended to be based on a small number of other strategies: property-use generation, imagined Disassembly of the target object into components and scanning of Broad Use categories for possible uses of the target item. Novelty of uses was particularly associated with the Disassembly strategy. Experiment 2 (N=103) addressed the role of executive processes in generating new and previously known uses by examining individual differences in category fluency, letter fluency and divergent task performance. After completing the task, participants were asked to indicate which of their responses were new for them. It was predicted and found in regression analyses that letter fluency (an executively loading task) was related to production of 'new' uses and category fluency was related to production of 'old' uses but not vice versa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17535464     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2007.tb00467.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  97 in total

Review 1.  Implicit Memory, Constructive Memory, and Imagining the Future: A Career Perspective.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-12-05

2.  Don't wait to incubate: immediate versus delayed incubation in divergent thinking.

Authors:  Kenneth J Gilhooly; George J Georgiou; Jane Garrison; Jon D Reston; Miroslav Sirota
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-08

3.  Creative constraints: Brain activity and network dynamics underlying semantic interference during idea production.

Authors:  Roger E Beaty; Alexander P Christensen; Mathias Benedek; Paul J Silvia; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-01-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Common and distinct brain networks underlying verbal and visual creativity.

Authors:  Wenfeng Zhu; Qunlin Chen; Lingxiang Xia; Roger E Beaty; Wenjing Yang; Fang Tian; Jiangzhou Sun; Guikang Cao; Qinglin Zhang; Xu Chen; Jiang Qiu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The Relationship Between Subthreshold Autistic Traits, Ambiguous Figure Perception and Divergent Thinking.

Authors:  Catherine Best; Shruti Arora; Fiona Porter; Martin Doherty
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-12

6.  Creative motivation: creative achievement predicts cardiac autonomic markers of effort during divergent thinking.

Authors:  Paul J Silvia; Roger E Beaty; Emily C Nusbaum; Kari M Eddington; Thomas R Kwapil
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Tracking the dynamics of divergent thinking via semantic distance: Analytic methods and theoretical implications.

Authors:  Richard W Hass
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-02

8.  The capacity to generate alternative ideas is more important than inhibition for logical reasoning in preschool-age children.

Authors:  Pier-Luc de Chantal; Henry Markovits
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-02

9.  Noninvasive brain stimulation to lateral prefrontal cortex alters the novelty of creative idea generation.

Authors:  Yoed N Kenett; David S Rosen; Emilio R Tamez; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Openness to Experience and Intellect Differentially Predict Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences.

Authors:  Scott Barry Kaufman; Lena C Quilty; Rachael G Grazioplene; Jacob B Hirsh; Jeremy R Gray; Jordan B Peterson; Colin G DeYoung
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2015-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.