Literature DB >> 17534674

Behavioral cues that great apes use to forage for hidden food.

David Buttelmann1, Josep Call, Michael Tomasello.   

Abstract

We conducted three studies to examine whether the four great ape species (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans) are able to use behavioral experimenter-given cues in an object-choice task. In the subsequent experimental conditions subjects were presented with two eggs, one of which contained food and the other did not. In Study 1 the experimenter examined both eggs by smelling or shaking them, but only made a failed attempt to open (via biting) the egg containing food. In a control condition, the experimenter examined and attempted to open both eggs, but in reverse order to control for stimulus enhancement. The apes significantly preferred the egg that was first examined and then bitten, but had no preference in a baseline condition in which there were no cues. In Study 2, we investigated whether the apes could extend this ability to cues not observed in apes so far (i.e., attempting to pull apart the egg), as well as whether they made this discrimination based on the function of the action the experimenter performed. Subjects significantly preferred eggs presented with this novel cue, but did not prefer eggs presented with a novel but functionally irrelevant action. In Study 3, apes did not interpret human actions as cues to food-location when they already knew that the eggs were empty. Thus, great apes were able to use a variety of experimenter-given cues associated with foraging actions to locate hidden food and thereby were partially sensitive to the general purpose underlying these actions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17534674     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-007-0095-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  7 in total

1.  Reward-related dynamical coupling between basolateral amygdala and nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Chia-Chun Hsu; Teresa E Madsen; Elizabeth O'Gorman; Shannon L Gourley; Donald G Rainnie
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.270

2.  Social cognition and metacognition in great apes: a theory.

Authors:  Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.899

3.  Early emerging system for reasoning about the social nature of food.

Authors:  Zoe Liberman; Amanda L Woodward; Kathleen R Sullivan; Katherine D Kinzler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Public information use in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Gill L Vale; Emma G Flynn; Susan P Lambeth; Steven J Schapiro; Rachel L Kendal
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  'Unwilling' versus 'unable': Tonkean macaques' understanding of human goal-directed actions.

Authors:  Charlotte Canteloup; Hélène Meunier
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Great apes distinguish true from false beliefs in an interactive helping task.

Authors:  David Buttelmann; Frances Buttelmann; Malinda Carpenter; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Do domestic dogs understand human actions as goal-directed?

Authors:  Sarah Marshall-Pescini; Maria Ceretta; Emanuela Prato-Previde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.