Literature DB >> 17534546

Strength of esophageal closure techniques with and without tissue reinforcement.

Ali Yeginsu1, Makbule Ergin, Unal Erkorkmaz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of esophagotomy closure techniques on the esophageal bursting pressure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Altogether, 122 freshly dead sheep esophagi received from the local slaughterhouse were prepared for manual closure. After esophagotomy, the specimens were divided into four groups. An interrupted mucosal suture pattern (n = 30), an interrupted mucosal-submucosal suture pattern (n = 30), an interrupted mucosal-submucosal + over-over continuous muscular suture pattern (n = 32), and an interrupted mucosal-submucosal + reinforcement with a diaphragmatic part with full-thickness interrupted U suture pattern (n = 30) were used for esophagotomy closure; 4-0 silk was used in all specimens. Bursting pressures were measured with a sphygmomanometer.
RESULTS: We found a statistically significant difference among the bursting pressures of all groups (p < 0.001). The bursting pressure values gradually increased from group 1 to group 4 (47.6 +/- 22.7, 86.2 +/- 49.5, 185.4 +/- 53.5, and 226.8 +/- 62.4 mmHg, respectively). Reinforcing the esophageal suture line with tissue significantly increased the bursting pressure compared to the other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Each layer of the esophagus significantly contributes to strengthening esophageal wall tension with primary esophageal closure, and reinforcement of the esophageal suture with tissue provides an additional significant increase in the bursting pressure of the esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17534546     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9084-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  14 in total

1.  Strain distribution in the layered wall of the esophagus.

Authors:  H Gregersen; T C Lee; S Chien; R Skalak; Y C Fung
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Participation of the intestinal layers in supplying of the mechanical strength of the intact and sutured gut.

Authors:  V I Egorov; V Schastlivtsev; R A Turusov; A O Baranov
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.745

3.  Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. I. Bursting strength of the colon after left colon resection and anastomosis.

Authors:  H Jiborn; J Ahonen; B Zederfeldt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Collagen metabolism in small intestinal anastomosis.

Authors:  K Jönsson; H Jiborn; B Zederfeldt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Functional suture-holding layer of the esophagus in the dog.

Authors:  M J Dallman
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1988-03-01       Impact factor: 1.936

6.  Photodynamic therapy and endoscopic mucosal resection as minimally invasive approaches for the treatment of early esophageal tumors: Pre-clinical and clinical experience in Lausanne.

Authors:  A Radu; P Grosjean; Y Jaquet; R Pilloud; G Wagnieres; H van den Bergh; Ph Monnier
Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.631

7.  Tissue holding power to a single suture in different parts of the alimentary tract.

Authors:  H Tera; C Aberg
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1976

8.  Partial esophagectomy with single layer closure for treatment of esophageal sarcomas in 6 dogs.

Authors:  Eyal Ranen; Merav H Shamir; Ron Shahar; Dudley E Johnston
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.495

9.  Omentopexy improves vascularization and decreases stricture formation of esophageal anastomoses in a dog model.

Authors:  Lili Hayari; Dan D Hershko; Hadas Shoshani; Ron Maor; Daniel Mordecovich; Gideon Shoshani
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.545

10.  Esophagotomy closure in the dog. A comparison of a double-layer appositional and two single-layer appositional techniques.

Authors:  M G Oakes; G Hosgood; T G Snider; C S Hedlund; M P Crawford
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.495

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.