BACKGROUND: Prevalence surveys have consistently found that the blood pressure control rate among people with hypertension is less than 25%. Studies of telemedicine as a means of providing care to hypertensive patients have shown that this approach is effective in lowering blood pressure. Major design flaws and high operating costs, however, have hindered its adoption by physicians and patients. OBJECTIVES: In the present commentary, the field of telemedicine, as it pertains to hypertension management, is reviewed, and the investigators' experiences in developing a new telemedicine system are outlined. METHODS: An applied qualitative case study approach was used to determine the information needs for the design of a telemedicine system. Opinions were elicited separately from type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension (n=24) and family practitioners in active clinical practice (n=18). RESULTS: Physician and patient focus group meetings provided key information that led to changes in the prototype system. The low level of computer and Internet use by patients in everyday life and by physicians in practice-related activities precluded their inclusion in the design of the system for information retrieval and receiving clinical alerts. For patients, the mobile phone appeared to be an acceptable alternative. The only practical, automated means to disseminate reports and alerts to physicians was by fax, which was the most universally available device in a doctor's office. CONCLUSION: This tightly focused qualitative study led to the development of design principles for a prototype system, increasing the likelihood of user acceptance and improving its effectiveness.
BACKGROUND: Prevalence surveys have consistently found that the blood pressure control rate among people with hypertension is less than 25%. Studies of telemedicine as a means of providing care to hypertensivepatients have shown that this approach is effective in lowering blood pressure. Major design flaws and high operating costs, however, have hindered its adoption by physicians and patients. OBJECTIVES: In the present commentary, the field of telemedicine, as it pertains to hypertension management, is reviewed, and the investigators' experiences in developing a new telemedicine system are outlined. METHODS: An applied qualitative case study approach was used to determine the information needs for the design of a telemedicine system. Opinions were elicited separately from type 2 diabeticpatients with hypertension (n=24) and family practitioners in active clinical practice (n=18). RESULTS: Physician and patient focus group meetings provided key information that led to changes in the prototype system. The low level of computer and Internet use by patients in everyday life and by physicians in practice-related activities precluded their inclusion in the design of the system for information retrieval and receiving clinical alerts. For patients, the mobile phone appeared to be an acceptable alternative. The only practical, automated means to disseminate reports and alerts to physicians was by fax, which was the most universally available device in a doctor's office. CONCLUSION: This tightly focused qualitative study led to the development of design principles for a prototype system, increasing the likelihood of user acceptance and improving its effectiveness.
Authors: Steven Shea; Ruth S Weinstock; Justin Starren; Jeanne Teresi; Walter Palmas; Lesley Field; Philip Morin; Robin Goland; Roberto E Izquierdo; L Thomas Wolff; Mohammed Ashraf; Charlyn Hilliman; Stephanie Silver; Suzanne Meyer; Douglas Holmes; Eva Petkova; Linnea Capps; Rafael A Lantigua Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2005-10-12 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Suzanne Murray; Patrice Lazure; Sara Schroter; Philipp J Leuschner; Peter Posel; Thomas Kellner; Richard D Jenkins Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Joseph A Cafazzo; Mark Casselman; Nathaniel Hamming; Debra K Katzman; Mark R Palmert Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 5.428