Literature DB >> 17533868

Impact of fullerene (C60) on a soil microbial community.

Zhonghua Tong1, Marianne Bischoff, Loring Nies, Bruce Applegate, Ronald F Turco.   

Abstract

The nascent state of the nanoproduct industry calls for important early assessment of environmental impacts before significant releases have occurred. Clearly, the impact of manufactured nanomaterials on key soil processes must be addressed so that an unbiased discussion concerning the environmental consequences of nanotechnology can take place. In this study, soils were treated with either 1 microg C60 g(-1) soil in aqueous suspension (nC60) or 1000 microg C60 g(-1) soil in granularform, a control containing equivalent tetrahydrofuran residues as generated during nC60 formation process or water and incubated for up to 180 days. Treatment effects on soil respiration, both basal and glucose-induced, were evaluated. The effects on the soil microbial community size was evaluated using total phospholipid derived phosphate. The impact on community structure was evaluated using both fatty acid profiles and following extraction of total genomic DNA, by DGGE after PCR amplification of total genomic DNA using bacterial variable V3 region targeted primers. In addition, treatment affects on soil enzymatic activities for beta-glucosidase, acid-phosphatase, dehydrogenase, and urease were followed. Our observations show that the introduction of fullerene, as either C60 or nC60, has little impact on the structure and function of the soil microbial community and microbial processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17533868     DOI: 10.1021/es061953l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  27 in total

1.  Does aqueous fullerene inhibit the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae or Escherichia coli?

Authors:  Alex N Hadduck; Vihangi Hindagolla; Alison E Contreras; Qilin Li; Alan T Bakalinsky
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effects of fullerene (C60), multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) and hydroxyl and carboxyl modified single wall carbon nanotubes on riverine microbial communities.

Authors:  J R Lawrence; M J Waiser; G D W Swerhone; J Roy; V Tumber; A Paule; A P Hitchcock; J J Dynes; D R Korber
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles.

Authors:  Richard D Handy; Frank von der Kammer; Jamie R Lead; Martin Hassellöv; Richard Owen; Mark Crane
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  The ecotoxicology of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: current status, knowledge gaps, challenges, and future needs.

Authors:  Richard D Handy; Richard Owen; Eugenia Valsami-Jones
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Short-term effect of aniline on soil microbial activity: a combined study by isothermal microcalorimetry, glucose analysis, and enzyme assay techniques.

Authors:  Huilun Chen; Rensheng Zhuang; Jun Yao; Fei Wang; Yiguang Qian; Kanaji Masakorala; Minmin Cai; Haijun Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  What can be inferred from bacterium-nanoparticle interactions about the potential consequences of environmental exposure to nanoparticles?

Authors:  Andrew L Neal
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 7.  Contrasting effects of engineered carbon nanotubes on plants: a review.

Authors:  Meththika Vithanage; Mihiri Seneviratne; Mahtab Ahmad; Binoy Sarkar; Yong Sik Ok
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 8.  Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far?

Authors:  Richard D Handy; Nico van den Brink; Mark Chappell; Martin Mühling; Renata Behra; Maria Dušinská; Peter Simpson; Jukka Ahtiainen; Awadhesh N Jha; Jennifer Seiter; Anthony Bednar; Alan Kennedy; Teresa F Fernandes; Michael Riediker
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Soybean susceptibility to manufactured nanomaterials with evidence for food quality and soil fertility interruption.

Authors:  John H Priester; Yuan Ge; Randall E Mielke; Allison M Horst; Shelly Cole Moritz; Katherine Espinosa; Jeff Gelb; Sharon L Walker; Roger M Nisbet; Youn-Joo An; Joshua P Schimel; Reid G Palmer; Jose A Hernandez-Viezcas; Lijuan Zhao; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey; Patricia A Holden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The impact of zero-valent iron nanoparticles upon soil microbial communities is context dependent.

Authors:  Mark Pawlett; Karl Ritz; Robert A Dorey; Sophie Rocks; Jeremy Ramsden; Jim A Harris
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.