BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recently, there has been much attention paid to understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying apoptosis and the functional consequences of apoptotic body clearance by phagocytes. In an attempt to investigate this latter aspect, the present study evaluated the anti-inflammatory effects of in vivo administration of phosphatidylserine (PS) liposomes, a well-characterised membrane component expressed during apoptosis. The participation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in PS-mediated effects was also investigated. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The anti-inflammatory effect of PS liposomes on the delayed phase of carrageenan mouse paw oedema was studied. PS liposomes were injected at different doses and times, after carrageenan. Hind paws were collected for evaluation of interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) levels, myeloperoxidase (MPO) and N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (NAG) activities and Evans blue dye leakage. Participation of PPAR pathways was explored by using PPAR antagonists (BADGE and GW9662). KEY RESULTS: Administration of PS, but not phosphatidylcholine (PC), liposomes (20-200 mg kg(-1), i.p., 8 h after carrageenan) reduced the paw oedema in a dose-dependent manner. PS liposomes were effective even when administered 24 and 48 h after carrageenan, a time at which indomethacin (1 mg kg(-1), i.p.) had no significant effects. Carrageenan-induced Evans blue leakage and IL-1beta production was decreased in PS-treated paws. The PPAR antagonists (BADGE and GW9662) partially prevented the anti-inflammatory effects of PS administration. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: PS liposomes have anti-inflammatory effects in vivo that are at least partly dependent on PPAR activation. Therapeutic strategies mimicking apoptosis may be useful for the treatment of inflammatory disorders.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recently, there has been much attention paid to understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying apoptosis and the functional consequences of apoptotic body clearance by phagocytes. In an attempt to investigate this latter aspect, the present study evaluated the anti-inflammatory effects of in vivo administration of phosphatidylserine (PS) liposomes, a well-characterised membrane component expressed during apoptosis. The participation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in PS-mediated effects was also investigated. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The anti-inflammatory effect of PS liposomes on the delayed phase of carrageenanmousepaw oedema was studied. PS liposomes were injected at different doses and times, after carrageenan. Hind paws were collected for evaluation of interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) levels, myeloperoxidase (MPO) and N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (NAG) activities and Evans blue dye leakage. Participation of PPAR pathways was explored by using PPAR antagonists (BADGE and GW9662). KEY RESULTS: Administration of PS, but not phosphatidylcholine (PC), liposomes (20-200 mg kg(-1), i.p., 8 h after carrageenan) reduced the paw oedema in a dose-dependent manner. PS liposomes were effective even when administered 24 and 48 h after carrageenan, a time at which indomethacin (1 mg kg(-1), i.p.) had no significant effects. Carrageenan-induced Evans blue leakage and IL-1beta production was decreased in PS-treated paws. The PPAR antagonists (BADGE and GW9662) partially prevented the anti-inflammatory effects of PS administration. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: PS liposomes have anti-inflammatory effects in vivo that are at least partly dependent on PPAR activation. Therapeutic strategies mimicking apoptosis may be useful for the treatment of inflammatory disorders.
Authors: Vanessa Pinho; Danielle G Souza; Michele M Barsante; Fabiana P Hamer; Marta S De Freitas; Adriano G Rossi; Mauro M Teixeira Journal: J Leukoc Biol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.962
Authors: Peter R Hoffmann; Jennifer A Kench; Andrea Vondracek; Ellen Kruk; David L Daleke; Michael Jordan; Philippa Marrack; Peter M Henson; Valerie A Fadok Journal: J Immunol Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Adriano G Rossi; Deborah A Sawatzky; Annemieke Walker; Carol Ward; Tara A Sheldrake; Nicola A Riley; Alison Caldicott; Magdalena Martinez-Losa; Trevor R Walker; Rodger Duffin; Mohini Gray; Elvira Crescenzi; Morag C Martin; Hugh J Brady; John S Savill; Ian Dransfield; Christopher Haslett Journal: Nat Med Date: 2006-09-03 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Andrei Maiseyeu; Marcus A Badgeley; Thomas Kampfrath; Georgeta Mihai; Jeffrey A Deiuliis; Cuiqing Liu; Qinghua Sun; Sampath Parthasarathy; Daniel I Simon; Kevin Croce; Sanjay Rajagopalan Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Reid A Roberts; Timothy K Eitas; James D Byrne; Brandon M Johnson; Patrick J Short; Karen P McKinnon; Shannon Reisdorf; J Christopher Luft; Joseph M DeSimone; Jenny P Ting Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Fiona Y Glassman; Jennifer L Schneider; Radha Ramakrishnan; Robert K Dingman; Murali Ramanathan; Richard B Bankert; Sathy V Balu-Iyer Journal: J Pharm Sci Date: 2018-04-09 Impact factor: 3.534
Authors: Michael A Collins; Kwan-Hoon Moon; Nuzhath Tajuddin; Edward J Neafsey; Hee-Yong Kim Journal: Neurotox Res Date: 2012-11-27 Impact factor: 3.911