Literature DB >> 1753166

Developmental capacities of two-cell mouse embryos frozen by three methods.

E Macas1, M Xie, P J Keller, B Imthurn, T Rülicke.   

Abstract

The following three methods were evaluated in order to obtain a most efficient freezing protocol for the preservation of two-cell mouse embryos: (a) slow cooling and slow thawing in 1.5 M dimethyl sulfoxide, (b) slow cooling and fast thawing in 1.5 M propanediol (PROH), and (c) ultrarapid freezing and fast thawing in either 3.5 M DMSO or 3.0 M PROH. In the slow-cooling procedures (a and b) ice nucleation (seeding) was induced manually or automatically. With method a, only a slight difference, 51.8% for manual and 58.9% for automatic seeding, was observed in survival rates, while the development to blastocysts was significantly affected: 35.4% with manual and less than 10% with automatic induction (P less than 0.001). Method b gave high survival (86.2%) and developmental rates (69.0%) with manual seeding compared with automatic seeding (20.7 and 9.8%, respectively; P less than 0.001). Using protocol c, higher survival and developmental rates were obtained with DMSO (84.8 and 55.9%) than with PROH (39.8 and 19.4%, P less than 0.001). These results demonstrate that inducing nucleation manually is superior to the use of a highly sophisticated autoseeding system and that method b with manual seeding is most effective in preserving the developmental capacity of two-cell mouse embryos after freezing and thawing. There is evidence that this is also true of human embryo cryopreservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1753166     DOI: 10.1007/bf01130806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf        ISSN: 0740-7769


  14 in total

1.  Ultrarapid freezing of early cleavage stage human embryos and eight-cell mouse embryos.

Authors:  A Trounson; A Peura; L Freemann; C Kirby
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Ultrarapid freezing: a new low-cost and effective method of embryo cryopreservation.

Authors:  A Trounson; A Peura; C Kirby
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Preservation of human eggs and embryos.

Authors:  A Trounson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Cryopreservation of pronucleate mouse ova: slow versus ultrarapid freezing.

Authors:  I Van der Auwera; F Cornillie; R Ongkowidjojo; R Pijnenborg; P R Koninckx
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Effects of the temperature of ice-seeding on survival of frozen-and-thawed mouse morulae.

Authors:  H Miyamoto; T Ishibashi
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1981-02-15

6.  Human embryo features that influence the success of cryopreservation with the use of 1,2 propanediol.

Authors:  B Lassalle; J Testart; J P Renard
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Development of mouse embryos cryopreserved by an ultra-rapid method of freezing.

Authors:  L Wilson; P Quinn
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Two-step freezing of two-cell rabbit embryos after partial dehydration at room temperature.

Authors:  J P Renard; V Garnier
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1984-07

9.  Factors affecting survival and implantation of cryopreserved human embryos.

Authors:  J Cohen; R S Simons; C B Fehilly; R G Edwards
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1986-02

10.  Cryopreserved zygotes and embryos and endocrinologic factors in the replacement cycle.

Authors:  J Cohen; G W DeVane; C W Elsner; H I Kort; J B Massey; S E Norbury
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of a programmed short-term stimulation protocol on the replacement of cryopreserved embryos.

Authors:  B Imthurn; E Macas; M Rosselli; P J Keller
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.412

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.