Literature DB >> 17531623

New frameless and framed intrauterine devices and systems - an overview.

Dirk Wildemeersch1.   

Abstract

There is a need for new, improved birth control methods which are easier to use, with less side effects and which avoid daily action, such as the pill. Perfect use requires consistent daily use or use at every act of intercourse. Long-acting methods eliminate the need for specific action at the time of coitus, or for daily action. Developing a new contraceptive is a major challenge. It is generally estimated that it takes 10-15 years to develop a new method and bring it to the market, at a cost of 200-300 million US dollars, and the industry is reluctant to take the risk of such long-term investment. However, both risk and investment can be reduced by taking small steps. Slight improvements of existing contraceptives could result in a giant step forward. The development of frameless intrauterine systems (IUS) is an attempt to improve the performance and acceptability of intrauterine contraception. Both the frameless GyneFix IUD and the frameless FibroPlant levonorgestrel (LNG)-IUS possess features which may solve the main problems encountered with conventional IUDs (e.g., expulsion, abnormal or excessive bleeding and pain). The performance of frameless devices, however, is dependent on correct anchoring of the device, which requires technical skill. Becoming a proficient GyneFix(R) or FibroPlant provider is easily acquired if the provider follows the procedural instruction strictly. For the less technically skilled provider, the Femilis LNG-IUS, using the new, simplified insertion technique, could be an excellent contraceptive option. It is usually not necessary to provide pain relief for insertion of an IUD/IUS, particularly in parous women. IUD providers should, however, realize that no woman likes to suffer from the insertion of an IUD. Severe discomfort may create a negative attitude towards the method. If the woman is anxious and fears pain (as most nulliparous women do), probably the most convenient, safe and effective method is to use local (intracervical) anesthesia using a dental syringe which can be applied with minimal risk in the office. In some women, the use of misoprostol 400 microg, 3 h prior to fitting of the IUD/IUS, may be useful to dilate the cervical canal. The popularity of the IUD could be much improved if attention is given to this aspect of IUD insertion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17531623     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.12.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  2 in total

Review 1.  Copper containing intra-uterine devices versus depot progestogens for contraception.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; Mandisa Singata; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-06-16

2.  Review of the safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Authors:  Chandra Kailasam; David Cahill
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.