Literature DB >> 17531239

Complications of three sacrospinous ligament fixation techniques.

J Pollak1, P Takacs, C Medina.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the complications of three techniques used to pass the suture through the sacrospinous ligament when performing sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF): (1) the standard needle driver with direct visualization; (2) the Deschamps ligature carrier by palpation; and (3) the Miya hook ligature carrier by palpation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 240 patients undergoing SSLF was performed. A standard needle driver with direct visualization was used for 46 patients; the Deschamps ligature carrier was used for 173, and the Miya hook for 21 patients. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: Twelve women (5%) had intraoperative and forty women (17%) had postoperative complications suspected directly from the suture placement. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of total intraoperative complications among the three groups. The proportion of patients with postoperative complications that were felt to be directly related to the suture passage technique was significantly higher in the Deschamps group compared to the direct visualization group (18% vs 2%, P=0.002).
CONCLUSION: Passing the suture through the sacrospinous ligament under direct visualization may result in less intra and postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17531239     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.04.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  9 in total

1.  Is standardised vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation a safe teaching procedure for residents?

Authors:  Axel Sauerwald; Inke Bruns; Barbara Peveling; Hendrik Brunke; Friedrich Wolff
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for uterovaginal prolapse: experience with 93 cases.

Authors:  Yanzhou Wang; Dan Wang; Yuyan Li; Zhiqing Liang; Huicheng Xu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Shveta Kapoor; Kanapathippillai Sivanesan; Jessica Amy Robertson; Mayooran Veerasingham; Vishal Kapoor
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Patient-reported outcomes after sacrospinous fixation of vault prolapse with a suturing device: a retrospective national cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer Campbell; Corinne Pedroletti; Linn Ekhed; Emil Nüssler; Annika Strandell
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  The effect of sacrospinous ligament fixation during vaginal hysterectomy on postoperative de novo stress incontinence occurrence: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up

Authors:  Eralp Başer; Kerem Doğa Seçkin; Pinar Kadiroğullari; Hüseyin Kiyak
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 0.973

6.  Responsibility toward affordable healthcare: disposable versus reusable methods for pelvic floor repair.

Authors:  Ivilina Pandeva; Helen Johnson; Mark Slack; Ashish Pradhan
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-10-17

7.  Role of Preoperative and Postoperative Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 in Evaluation of Posthysterectomy Vault Prolapse.

Authors:  Jai Bhagwan Sharma; Mukesh Kumar; K K Roy; Rajesh Kumari; Kavita Pandey
Journal:  J Midlife Health       Date:  2021-07-27

8.  Surgical management of pudendal nerve entrapment after sacrospinous ligament fixation.

Authors:  Eva V Vodegel; Kim W M van Delft; Charlotte H C Nuboer; Claudia R Kowalik; Jan-Paul W R Roovers
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 7.331

9.  Vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Azubuike Uzoma; K A Farag
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009-08-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.