Literature DB >> 17531083

BubR1 deficiency results in enhanced activation of MEK and ERKs upon microtubule stresses.

Y L Yang1, Q Duan, T B Guo, X X Wang, Q Ruan, G T Xu, J W Zhang, Z Y Lu, M Xu, L Lu, W Dai.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Disruption of microtubules activates the spindle checkpoint, of which BubR1 is a major component. Our early studies show that BubR1 haplo-insufficiency results in enhanced mitotic slippage in vitro and tumorigenesis in vivo.
OBJECTIVE: Given that both MAPKs/ERKs and MEK play an important role during mitosis, we investigated whether there existed regulatory relationship between the MAPK signalling pathway and BubR1. METHOD AND
RESULTS: Here, we have demonstrated that BubR1 deficiency is correlated with enhanced activation of MEK and ERKs after disruption of microtubule dynamics. Specifically, treatment with nocodazole and paclitaxel resulted in hyper-activation of ERKs and MEK in BubR1(+/-) murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) compared to that of wild-type MEFs. This enhanced activation of ERKs and MEK was at least partly responsible for more successful proliferation completion when cells were treated with nocodazole. BubR1 knockdown via RNAi resulted in enhanced activation of ERKs and MEK in HeLa cells, correlating with inhibition of PP1, a negative regulator of MEK. Moreover, when BubR1 was partially inactivated due to premature missegregation of chromosomes after Sgo1 depletion, phosphorylation of ERKs and MEK was enhanced in mitotic cells; in contrast, little, if any activated ERKs and MEK were detected in mitotic cells induced by nocodazole. Furthermore, BubR1, activated ERKs and activated MEK all localized to spindle poles during mitosis, and also, the proteins physically interacted with each other.
CONCLUSION: Our studies suggest that there exists a cross-talk between spindle checkpoint components and ERKs and MEK and that BubR1 may play an important role in mediating the cross-talk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17531083      PMCID: PMC6495970          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2007.00443.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Prolif        ISSN: 0960-7722            Impact factor:   6.831


  33 in total

Review 1.  c-Mos and cyclin B/cdc2 connections during Xenopus oocyte maturation.

Authors:  A Castro; M Peter; T Lorca; E Mandart
Journal:  Biol Cell       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.458

2.  Cancer. An unstable liaison.

Authors:  Christoph Lengauer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Modulation of microtubule dynamics by drugs: a paradigm for the actions of cellular regulators.

Authors:  L Wilson; D Panda; M A Jordan
Journal:  Cell Struct Funct       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.212

4.  Human Prk is a conserved protein serine/threonine kinase involved in regulating M phase functions.

Authors:  B Ouyang; H Pan; L Lu; J Li; P Stambrook; B Li; W Dai
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-11-07       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Differential subcellular localizations of two human Sgo1 isoforms: implications in regulation of sister chromatid cohesion and microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Xiaoxing Wang; Yali Yang; Wei Dai
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Effects of MEK inhibitor U0126 on meiotic progression in mouse oocytes: microtuble organization, asymmetric division and metaphase II arrest.

Authors:  Chao Tong; Heng Yu Fan; Da Yuan Chen; Xiang Fen Song; Heide Schatten; Qing Yuan Sun
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 25.617

7.  Constitutional aneuploidy and cancer predisposition caused by biallelic mutations in BUB1B.

Authors:  Sandra Hanks; Kim Coleman; Sarah Reid; Alberto Plaja; Helen Firth; David Fitzpatrick; Alexa Kidd; Károly Méhes; Richard Nash; Nathanial Robin; Nora Shannon; John Tolmie; John Swansbury; Alexandre Irrthum; Jenny Douglas; Nazneen Rahman
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-10-10       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  The Yin and Yang of centromeric cohesion of sister chromatids: mitotic kinases meet protein phosphatase 2A.

Authors:  Wei Dai; Xiaoxing Wang
Journal:  Cell Div       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 5.130

9.  Human BUBR1 is a mitotic checkpoint kinase that monitors CENP-E functions at kinetochores and binds the cyclosome/APC.

Authors:  G K Chan; S A Jablonski; V Sudakin; J C Hittle; T J Yen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-09-06       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Active MAP kinase in mitosis: localization at kinetochores and association with the motor protein CENP-E.

Authors:  M Zecevic; A D Catling; S T Eblen; L Renzi; J C Hittle; T J Yen; G J Gorbsky; M J Weber
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-09-21       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  4 in total

1.  Eukaryotic initiation factor 6 is rate-limiting in translation, growth and transformation.

Authors:  Valentina Gandin; Annarita Miluzio; Anna Maria Barbieri; Anne Beugnet; Hiroaki Kiyokawa; Pier Carlo Marchisio; Stefano Biffo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The yin and yang of the Cdkn2a locus in senescence and aging.

Authors:  Darren J Baker; Fang Jin; Jan M van Deursen
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-09-28       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  RAF associates with phosphorylated nuclear BubR1 during endoreduplication induced by JAK inhibition.

Authors:  Gudrun Reiterer; Lihua Chen; Ryan Tassef; Jeffery D Varner; Chang-Yan Chen; Andrew Yen
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 5.173

4.  Evolutionary conservation and network structure characterize genes of phenotypic relevance for mitosis in human.

Authors:  Marek Ostaszewski; Serge Eifes; Antonio del Sol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.