Literature DB >> 17531047

National threatened species listing based on IUCN criteria and regional guidelines: current status and future perspectives.

Rebecca M Miller1, Jon Paul Rodríguez, Theresa Aniskowicz-Fowler, Channa Bambaradeniya, Ruben Boles, Mark A Eaton, Ulf Gärdenfors, Verena Keller, Sanjay Molur, Sally Walker, Caroline Pollock.   

Abstract

As countries worldwide become increasingly interested in conserving biodiversity, the profile of national threatened species lists expands and these lists become more influential in determining conservation priorities. The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Categories and Criteria for evaluating extinction risk, originally intended for use at the global level, are increasingly being used at the national level. To facilitate this process, the IUCN recently published guidelines for the application of the criteria at subglobal levels. We evaluated the application of these guidelines, focusing on the opinions and experience of the global community of national assessors. To assess the extent to which IUCN criteria have been used in official national listing efforts, we sent a survey to 180 Convention on Biological Diversity national focal points designated by governments. Of the respondents, 77% had developed national threatened species lists. Of these, 78% applied a version of the IUCN criteria, and 88% plan to produce future threatened species lists. The majority of this last group (83%) will use IUCN criteria. Of the countries that have or will develop a threatened species list, 82% incorporated their list or the IUCN criteria into national conservation strategies. We further explored the issues highlighted by the survey results by integrating the experience of assessors that have produced national lists. Most of the problems national assessors faced when applying the IUCN criteria arose when the criteria were applied at the regional level without the IUCN Regional Guidelines and when assessors were confused about the purpose of the IUCN criteria and lacked training in their proper use. To improve their clarity and increase their repeatability, we recommend that the IUCN increase communication and information exchange among countries and between regional and global assessors, potentially through an interactive Web site, to facilitate the development of national red lists and to improve their conservation value within and between countries.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17531047     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00656.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  6 in total

Review 1.  A practical guide to the application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria.

Authors:  Jon Paul Rodríguez; David A Keith; Kathryn M Rodríguez-Clark; Nicholas J Murray; Emily Nicholson; Tracey J Regan; Rebecca M Miller; Edmund G Barrow; Lucie M Bland; Kaia Boe; Thomas M Brooks; María A Oliveira-Miranda; Mark Spalding; Piet Wit
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Mapping and navigating mammalian conservation: from analysis to action.

Authors:  Kent H Redford; Justina C Ray; Luigi Boitani
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  How to conserve threatened Chinese plant species with extremely small populations?

Authors:  Sergei Volis
Journal:  Plant Divers       Date:  2016-05-20

4.  Scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of ecosystems.

Authors:  David A Keith; Jon Paul Rodríguez; Kathryn M Rodríguez-Clark; Emily Nicholson; Kaisu Aapala; Alfonso Alonso; Marianne Asmussen; Steven Bachman; Alberto Basset; Edmund G Barrow; John S Benson; Melanie J Bishop; Ronald Bonifacio; Thomas M Brooks; Mark A Burgman; Patrick Comer; Francisco A Comín; Franz Essl; Don Faber-Langendoen; Peter G Fairweather; Robert J Holdaway; Michael Jennings; Richard T Kingsford; Rebecca E Lester; Ralph Mac Nally; Michael A McCarthy; Justin Moat; María A Oliveira-Miranda; Phil Pisanu; Brigitte Poulin; Tracey J Regan; Uwe Riecken; Mark D Spalding; Sergio Zambrano-Martínez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Pheromones and Other Semiochemicals for Monitoring Rare and Endangered Species.

Authors:  Mattias C Larsson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Integrating multiple sources of ecological data to unveil macroscale species abundance.

Authors:  Keiichi Fukaya; Buntarou Kusumoto; Takayuki Shiono; Junichi Fujinuma; Yasuhiro Kubota
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.