Literature DB >> 17530956

The cardiorespiratory, anthropometric, and performance characteristics of an international/national touring ballet company.

Matthew A Wyon1, Martine A Deighan, Alan M Nevill, Michael Doherty, Sharon L Morrison, Nick Allen, Simon J Jobson, Simon George.   

Abstract

This study examined the cardiorespiratory and anthropometric indices of professional classical ballet dancers in relation to company seniority, gender, and supplemental training. Forty-nine participants from an international touring company carried out a peak Vo(2) test and vertical jump test. Anthropometric measurements and supplemental training activities were also recorded for each participant. Statistical analyses showed significant differences between gender and dancer seniority levels. Gender differences were seen for jump height (M = 52.7 +/- 7.12 cm; F = 37.6 +/- 5.32 cm) and peak Vo(2) (M = 49.32 +/- 3.72 ml.kg(-1).min(-1); F = 43.3 +/- 5.16 ml.kg(-1).min(-1)). Differences were also seen between dancer levels for peak Vo(2) (artist = 46.47 +/- 4.67 ml.kg(-1).min(-1); first artist = 42.72 +/- 5.81 ml.kg(-1).min(-1); soloist = 43.38 +/- 7.14 ml.kg(-1).min(-1); principal = 49.04 +/- 3.63 ml.kg(-1).min(-1)) and jump height (artist = 42.0 +/- 9.11 cm; first artist = 50.33 +/- 11.65 cm; soloist = 45.6 +/- 9.78 cm; principal = 44.67 +/- 9.53 cm). Pairwise post hoc comparisons showed that corps and principals had significantly greater relative peak Vo(2) than first artists and soloists (p < 0.05), while soloists and first artists had significantly greater jump heights compared to principals and corps (p < 0.05). Analysis of covariance modeling indicated that the self-reported mode of supplemental training had no association with relative peak Vo(2) or the percentage at which ventilatory threshold occurred. The present study has provided further insight into the cardiorespiratory profiles of classical ballet dancers, where soloists have significantly greater power capacities compared to principals and corps, who in turn had significantly greater aerobic power. These data can help guide strength and conditioning intervention strategies that need to take into account the nuances of the different seniority levels within a dance company.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17530956     DOI: 10.1519/R-19405.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  Energy cost and energy sources of a ballet dance exercise in female adolescents with different technical ability.

Authors:  Laura Guidetti; Gian Pietro Emerenziani; Maria Chiara Gallotta; Sergio Gregorio Da Silva; Carlo Baldari
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Lower body stiffness and muscle activity differences between female dancers and basketball players during drop jumps.

Authors:  Jatin P Ambegaonkar; Sandra J Shultz; David H Perrin; Randy J Schmitz; Terry A Ackerman; Mark R Schulz
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.843

3.  Supplementary low-intensity aerobic training improves aerobic capacity and does not affect psychomotor performance in professional female ballet dancers.

Authors:  Ewelina Smol; Artur Fredyk
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  Developing a dancer wellness program employing developmental evaluation.

Authors:  Terry Clark; Arun Gupta; Chester H Ho
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-10

5.  Work related cardiovascular load in professional dance teachers - a pilot study.

Authors:  Eileen M Wanke; Mike Schmidt; Gerhard Oremek; David A Groneberg
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.646

6.  Ecological and Construct Validity of a New Technical Level Cuban Dance Field Test.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Alin Larion; Olfa Turki; Ionel Melenco; Cristian Popa; Stefano Palermi; Gian Mario Migliaccio; Stefania Mannarini; Alessandro Alberto Rossi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.