Literature DB >> 17530379

Evaluation of reparative cartilage after autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondritis dissecans: histology, biochemistry, and MR imaging.

Takuro Moriya1, Yuichi Wada, Atsuya Watanabe, Takahisa Sasho, Koichi Nakagawa, Pierre Mainil-Varlet, Hideshige Moriya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the biochemical properties, histological and immunohistochemical appearance, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings of reparative cartilage after autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD).
METHODS: Six patients (mean age 20.2 +/- 8.8 years; 13-35 years) who underwent ACI for full-thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle were studied. One year after the procedure, a second-look arthroscopic operation was performed with biopsy of reparative tissue. The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) visual histological assessment scale was used for histological assessment. Biopsied tissue was immunohistochemically analyzed with the use of monoclonal antihuman collagen type I and monoclonal antihuman collagen type II primary antibodies. Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) concentrations in biopsied reparative cartilage samples were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). MR imaging was performed with T1- and T2-weighted imaging and three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled (3D-SPGR) MR imaging.
RESULTS: Four tissue samples were graded as having a mixed morphology of hyaline and fibrocartilage while the other two were graded as fibrocartilage. Average ICRS scores for each criterion were (I) 1.0 +/- 1.5; (II) 1.7 +/- 0.5; (III) 0.6 +/- 1.0; (IV) 3.0 +/- 0.0; (V) 1.8 +/- 1.5; and (VI) 2.5 +/- 1.2. Average total score was 10.7 +/- 2.8. On immunohistochemical analysis, the matrix from deep and middle layers of reparative cartilage stained positive for type II collagen; however, the surface layer did not stain well. The average GAG concentration in reparative cartilage was 76.6 +/- 4.2 microg/mg whereas that in normal cartilage was 108 +/- 11.2 microg/mg. Common complications observed on 3D-SPGR MR imaging were hypertrophy of grafted periosteum, edema-like signal in bone marrow, and incomplete repair of subchondral bone at the surgical site. Clinically, patients had significant improvements in Lysholm scores.
CONCLUSIONS: In spite of a good clinical course, reparative cartilage after ACI had less GAG concentration and was inferior to healthy hyaline cartilage in histological and immunohistochemical appearance and on MRI findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17530379     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-007-1111-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  17 in total

1.  Longitudinal analysis of T1ρ and T2 quantitative MRI of knee cartilage laminar organization following microfracture surgery.

Authors:  Alexander A Theologis; William W Schairer; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Sharmila Majumdar; Xiaojuan Li; C Benjamin Ma
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: mid-term and long-term follow-up by MR arthrography.

Authors:  Eugenio Genovese; Mario Ronga; Maria Gloria Angeretti; Raffaele Novario; Anna Leonardi; Mauro Albrizio; Leonardo Callegari; Carlo Fugazzola
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Can fresh osteochondral allografts restore function in juveniles with osteochondritis dissecans of the knee?

Authors:  Roger Lyon; Carl Nissen; Xue Cheng Liu; Brian Curtin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Donor's site evaluation after restoration with autografts or synthetic plugs in rabbits.

Authors:  Konstantinos S Intzoglou; Dimitrios S Mastrokalos; Dimitrios S Korres; Kleo Papaparaskeva; Dimitrios Koulalis; George C Babis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-09-18

5.  T(1ρ) and T(2) quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of cartilage regeneration following microfracture and mosaicplasty cartilage resurfacing procedures.

Authors:  Daniel J Holtzman; Alexander A Theologis; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Sharmila Majumdar; Xiaojuan Li; C Benjamin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  NELL-1 promotes cartilage regeneration in an in vivo rabbit model.

Authors:  Ronald K Siu; Janette N Zara; Yaping Hou; Aaron W James; Jinny Kwak; Xinli Zhang; Kang Ting; Benjamin M Wu; Chia Soo; Min Lee
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 7.  We do not have evidence based methods for the treatment of cartilage defects in the knee.

Authors:  Jan P Benthien; Manuela Schwaninger; Peter Behrens
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  One-step bone marrow-derived cell transplantation in talar osteochondral lesions.

Authors:  Sandro Giannini; Roberto Buda; Francesca Vannini; Marco Cavallo; Brunella Grigolo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation to repair knee cartilage injury: ultrastructural evaluation at 2 years and long-term follow-up including muscle strength measurements.

Authors:  Sverre Løken; Tom C Ludvigsen; Turid Høysveen; Inger Holm; Lars Engebretsen; Finn P Reinholt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Matrix induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee: Comparison between osteochondritis dissecans and osteonecrosis and effect of chondrocyte thickness on prognosis.

Authors:  Murat Aydın; Mehmet Yorubulut; Kerem Başarır; Murat Arıkan; Mehmet Serdar Binnet
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.511

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.