Literature DB >> 17530329

Economic impacts of zebra mussels on drinking water treatment and electric power generation facilities.

Nancy A Connelly1, Charles R O'Neill, Barbara A Knuth, Tommy L Brown.   

Abstract

Invasions of nonnative species such as zebra mussels can have both ecological and economic consequences. The economic impacts of zebra mussels have not been examined in detail since the mid-1990s. The purpose of this study was to quantify the annual and cumulative economic impact of zebra mussels on surface water-dependent drinking water treatment and electric power generation facilities (where previous research indicated the greatest impacts). The study time frame was from the first full year after discovery in North America (Lake St. Clair, 1989) to the present (2004); the study area was throughout the mussels' North American range. A mail survey resulted in a response rate of 31% for electric power companies and 41% for drinking water treatment plants. Telephone interviews with a sample of nonrespondents assessed nonresponse bias; only one difference was found and adjusted for. Over one-third (37%) of surveyed facilities reported finding zebra mussels in the facility and almost half (45%) have initiated preventive measures to prevent zebra mussels from entering the facility operations. Almost all surveyed facilities (91%) with zebra mussels have used control or mitigation alternatives to remove or control zebra mussels. We estimated that 36% of surveyed facilities experienced an economic impact. Expanding the sample to the population of the study area, we estimated 267 million dollars (BCa 95% CI = 161 million dollars - 467 million dollars) in total economic costs for electric generation and water treatment facilities through late 2004, since 1989. Annual costs were greater (44,000 dollars/facility) during the early years of zebra mussel infestation than in recent years (30,000 dollars). As a result of this and other factors, early predictions of the ultimate costs of the zebra mussel invasion may have been excessive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17530329     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-006-0296-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  2 in total

1.  Aquatic nuisance species in the New York State Canal and Hudson River systems and the Great Lakes Basin: an economic and environmental assessment.

Authors:  David Pimentel
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Zebra Mussel Invasion Threatens U.S. Waters: Damage estimates soar into the billions for the zebra mussel, just one of many invaders entering U.S. waters via ballast water.

Authors:  L Roberts
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-09-21       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total
  15 in total

1.  Long-term changes in a population of an invasive bivalve and its effects.

Authors:  David L Strayer; Nuria Cid; Heather M Malcom
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  What is Novel About Novel Ecosystems: Managing Change in an Ever-Changing World.

Authors:  Amy M Truitt; Elise F Granek; Matthew J Duveneck; Kaitlin A Goldsmith; Meredith P Jordan; Kimberly C Yazzie
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Early detection monitoring for larval dreissenid mussels: how much plankton sampling is enough?

Authors:  Timothy D Counihan; Stephen M Bollens
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Effects of Outreach on the Prevention of Aquatic Invasive Species Spread among Organism-in-Trade Hobbyists.

Authors:  Erin Seekamp; Jessica E Mayer; Patrice Charlebois; Greg Hitzroth
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 5.  Misleading estimates of economic impacts of biological invasions: Including the costs but not the benefits.

Authors:  Demetrio Boltovskoy; Radu Guiaşu; Lyubov Burlakova; Alexander Karatayev; Martin A Schlaepfer; Nancy Correa
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.943

Review 6.  What we know and don't know about the invasive zebra (Dreissena polymorpha) and quagga (Dreissena rostriformis bugensis) mussels.

Authors:  Alexander Y Karatayev; Lyubov E Burlakova
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 2.822

7.  Incentivizing the public to support invasive species management: eurasian milfoil reduces lakefront property values.

Authors:  Julian D Olden; Mariana Tamayo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Probability Co-Kriging Model to Account for Reporting Bias and Recognize Areas at High Risk for Zebra Mussels and Eurasian Watermilfoil Invasions in Minnesota.

Authors:  Kaushi S T Kanankege; Moh A Alkhamis; Nicholas B D Phelps; Andres M Perez
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-01-04

9.  Lessons Learned From the Stakeholder Engagement in Research: Application of Spatial Analytical Tools in One Health Problems.

Authors:  Kaushi S T Kanankege; Nicholas B D Phelps; Heidi M Vesterinen; Kaylee M Errecaborde; Julio Alvarez; Jeffrey B Bender; Scott J Wells; Andres M Perez
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-05-13

Review 10.  Non-native species have multiple abundance-impact curves.

Authors:  David L Strayer
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.