Literature DB >> 17530246

Technical errors in MR arthrography.

Juerg Hodler1.   

Abstract

This article discusses potential technical problems of MR arthrography. It starts with contraindications, followed by problems relating to injection technique, contrast material and MR imaging technique. For some of the aspects discussed, there is only little published evidence. Therefore, the article is based on the personal experience of the author and on local standards of procedures. Such standards, as well as medico-legal considerations, may vary from country to country. Contraindications for MR arthrography include pre-existing infection, reflex sympathetic dystrophy and possibly bleeding disorders, avascular necrosis and known allergy to contrast media. Errors in injection technique may lead to extra-articular collection of contrast agent or to contrast agent leaking from the joint space, which may cause diagnostic difficulties. Incorrect concentrations of contrast material influence image quality and may also lead to non-diagnostic examinations. Errors relating to MR imaging include delays between injection and imaging and inadequate choice of sequences. Potential solutions to the various possible errors are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17530246     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-007-0329-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  25 in total

Review 1.  Direct MR arthrography: a review of current use.

Authors:  A J Grainger; J M Elliott; R S Campbell; P F Tirman; L S Steinbach; H K Genant
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Direct MR arthrography of the shoulder: is exercise prior to imaging beneficial or detrimental?

Authors:  M L Brenner; W B Morrison; J A Carrino; C A Nusser; T G Sanders; R F Howard; P Meier
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  MR arthrography of the glenohumeral joint: two concentrations of gadoteridol versus Ringer solution as the intraarticular contrast material.

Authors:  C A Binkert; M Zanetti; C Gerber; J Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Complications of Arthrography.

Authors:  Philip C. Hugo; Arthur H. Newberg; Joel S. Newman; Steven M. Wetzner
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 5.  Special focus session. MR arthrography.

Authors:  Lynne S Steinbach; William E Palmer; Mark E Schweitzer
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  A prospective study of the safety of joint and soft tissue aspirations and injections in patients taking warfarin sodium.

Authors:  J Thumboo; J D O'Duffy
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1998-04

7.  Effusion criteria and clinical importance of glenohumeral joint fluid: MR imaging evaluation.

Authors:  M E Schweitzer; M J Magbalon; J M Fenlin; B G Frieman; S Ehrlich; R E Epstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Complications of arthrography.

Authors:  A H Newberg; C S Munn; A H Robbins
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Risk factors for septic arthritis in patients with joint disease. A prospective study.

Authors:  C J Kaandorp; D Van Schaardenburg; P Krijnen; J D Habbema; M A van de Laar
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1995-12

10.  MR arthrography of the shoulder with gadopentetate dimeglumine: influence of concentration, iodinated contrast material, and time on signal intensity.

Authors:  L Kopka; M Funke; U Fischer; D Keating; J Oestmann; E Grabbe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  17 in total

1.  Cone-beam computed tomography arthrography: an innovative modality for the evaluation of wrist ligament and cartilage injuries.

Authors:  Reeta Ramdhian-Wihlm; Jean-Marie Le Minor; Matthieu Schmittbuhl; Jeremy Jeantroux; Peter Mac Mahon; Francis Veillon; Jean-Claude Dosch; Jean-Louis Dietemann; Guillaume Bierry
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Ultrasound guidance to perform intra-articular injection of gadolinium-based contrast material for magnetic resonance arthrography as an alternative to fluoroscopy: the time is now.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Giuseppe Banfi; Alberto Aliprandi; Giovanni Mauri; Francesco Secchi; Francesco Sardanelli; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Inadvertent intraosseous gadolinium injection during pediatric shoulder MR arthrography.

Authors:  Jason R Pack; Martin I Jordanov; John J Block
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-04-15

4.  An alternative injection technique for performing MR ankle arthrography: the lateral mortise approach.

Authors:  Philip R Wright; Michael G Fox; Bennett Alford; James T Patrie; Mark W Anderson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The value of magnetic resonance arthrography of the temporomandibular joint in imaging disc adhesions and perforations.

Authors:  G Venetis; M Pilavaki; K Triantafyllidou; A Papachristodoulou; N Lazaridis; P Palladas
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Extra-articular contrast material leaks into locations unrelated to the injection path in shoulder MR arthrography.

Authors:  Hayri Ogul; Mecit Kantarci; Murat Topal; Leyla Karaca; Kutsi Tuncer; Berhan Pirimoglu; Aylin Okur; Omer Selim Yildirim; Akin Levent
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Diagnostic Performance of MR Arthrography with Anterior Trans-Subscapularis versus Posterior Injection Approach for Subscapularis Tendon Tears at 3.0T.

Authors:  Joon-Yong Jung; Won-Hee Jee; Chang-Woo Chun; Yang-Soo Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Comparative analysis of anterior and posterior contrast injection approaches for shoulder MR arthrograms in adolescents.

Authors:  Theodore B Gupton; Jorge Delgado; Diego Jaramillo; Anne M Cahill; Nancy A Chauvin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-09-01

9.  MR arthrography of the shoulder: tolerance evaluation of four different injection techniques.

Authors:  Evangelos Perdikakis; Eleni Drakonaki; Thomas Maris; Apostolos Karantanas
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Musculoskeletal aspiration procedures.

Authors:  Barry Glenn Hansford; Gregory Scott Stacy
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.