Literature DB >> 17524807

Biomarkers of treatment response in clinical trials of novel antituberculosis agents.

Felicity M R Perrin1, Marc C I Lipman, Timothy D McHugh, Stephen H Gillespie.   

Abstract

Global initiatives have been launched to develop improved tuberculosis chemotherapy. New drugs and potential treatment-shortening regimens require careful assessment in clinical trials, but existing markers of treatment outcome-clinical cure and relapse-require prolonged follow-up of patients. There is, therefore, a need to find alternative biomarkers or surrogate endpoints predictive of response. Effective treatment requires drugs with sterilising activity to produce clinical cure without relapse, and thus a useful biomarker for a drug under trial must predict the likelihood of relapse. We explore the strengths and weaknesses of existing biomarkers, which assess either host response or mycobacterial load. Change in mycobacterial burden is likely to be the best indicator of treatment outcome, but the optimum study techniques remain undefined. Finally, we propose methods to assess candidate markers, and how these candidate markers could be implemented in future clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17524807     DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70112-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis        ISSN: 1473-3099            Impact factor:   25.071


  31 in total

Review 1.  New drugs against tuberculosis: problems, progress, and evaluation of agents in clinical development.

Authors:  Jossy van den Boogaard; Gibson S Kibiki; Elton R Kisanga; Martin J Boeree; Rob E Aarnoutse
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Noninvasive pulmonary [18F]-2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography correlates with bactericidal activity of tuberculosis drug treatment.

Authors:  Stephanie L Davis; Eric L Nuermberger; Peter K Um; Camille Vidal; Bruno Jedynak; Martin G Pomper; William R Bishai; Sanjay K Jain
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  CDC/NIH Workshop. Tuberculosis biomarker and surrogate endpoint research roadmap.

Authors:  Payam Nahid; Jussi Saukkonen; William R Mac Kenzie; John L Johnson; Patrick P J Phillips; Janet Andersen; Erin Bliven-Sizemore; John T Belisle; W Henry Boom; Annie Luetkemeyer; Thomas B Campbell; Kathleen D Eisenach; Richard Hafner; Jeffrey L Lennox; Mamodikoe Makhene; Susan Swindells; M Elsa Villarino; Marc Weiner; Constance Benson; William Burman
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 4.  Advances and hurdles on the way toward a leprosy vaccine.

Authors:  Malcolm S Duthie; Thomas P Gillis; Steven G Reed
Journal:  Hum Vaccin       Date:  2011-11-01

5.  Comparative Diagnostic Utility of Neopterin and IFN-γ/IL-2 in Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Nisha Goyal; Bineeta Kashyap; N P Singh; Iqbal R Kaur
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  13[C]-urea breath test as a novel point-of-care biomarker for tuberculosis treatment and diagnosis.

Authors:  Mandeep S Jassal; Gueno G Nedeltchev; Jong-Hee Lee; Seong Won Choi; Viorel Atudorei; Zachary D Sharp; Vojo Deretic; Graham S Timmins; William R Bishai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide plasma concentrations in relation to treatment response in Indonesian pulmonary tuberculosis patients.

Authors:  Erlina Burhan; Carolien Ruesen; Rovina Ruslami; Arum Ginanjar; Hadiarto Mangunnegoro; Purwantyastuti Ascobat; Rogier Donders; Reinout van Crevel; Rob Aarnoutse
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Assessment of treatment response in tuberculosis.

Authors:  Neesha Rockwood; Elsa du Bruyn; Thomas Morris; Robert J Wilkinson
Journal:  Expert Rev Respir Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Evaluation of serum inflammatory biomarkers as predictors of treatment outcome in pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  A Singanayagam; K Manalan; D W Connell; J D Chalmers; S Sridhar; A I Ritchie; A Lalvani; M Wickremasinghe; O M Kon
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Aptamer-based proteomic signature of intensive phase treatment response in pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  Payam Nahid; Erin Bliven-Sizemore; Leah G Jarlsberg; Mary A De Groote; John L Johnson; Grace Muzanyi; Melissa Engle; Marc Weiner; Nebojsa Janjic; David G Sterling; Urs A Ochsner
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.131

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.