Literature DB >> 17524757

The safety of warfarin therapy in the nursing home setting.

Jerry H Gurwitz1, Terry S Field, Martha J Radford, Leslie R Harrold, Richard Becker, George Reed, Kristin DeBellis, Jason Moldoff, Nancy Verzier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the preventability of adverse warfarin-related events and potential adverse warfarin-related events ("near misses") in the nursing home setting.
METHODS: We performed a cohort study of all long-term care residents of 25 nursing homes (bed size range, 90-360) in Connecticut during a 12-month observation period. The total number of residents in these facilities ranged from 2946 to 3212 per quarter. There were 490 residents who received warfarin therapy. Possible warfarin-related incidents were detected by quarterly retrospective review of nursing home records by trained nurse abstractors. Each incident was independently classified by 2 physician-reviewers to determine whether it constituted a warfarin-related event, its severity, and its preventability. The primary outcome was an adverse warfarin-related event, defined as an injury associated with the use of warfarin. Potential adverse warfarin-related events were defined as situations in which the international normalized ratio (INR) was noted to be 4.5 or greater, an error in management was noted, but no injury occurred. We also assessed time in specified INR ranges per nursing home resident day on warfarin.
RESULTS: Over the 12-month observation period, 720 adverse warfarin-related events and 253 potential adverse warfarin-related events were identified. Of the adverse warfarin-related events, 625 (87%) were characterized as minor, 82 (11%) were deemed serious, and 13 (2%) were life-threatening or fatal. Overall, 29% of the adverse warfarin-related events were judged to be preventable. Serious, life-threatening, or fatal events occurred at a rate of 2.49 per 100 resident-months; 57% of these more severe events were considered preventable. Errors resulting in preventable events occurred most often at the prescribing and monitoring stages of warfarin management. The percentages of time in the less than 2, 2 to 3, and more than 3 INR ranges were 36.5%, 49.6%, and 13.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of warfarin in the nursing home setting presents substantial safety concerns for patients. Adverse events associated with warfarin therapy are common and often preventable in the nursing home setting. Prevention strategies should target the prescribing and monitoring stages of warfarin management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17524757     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.07.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  21 in total

1.  Bridging for an isolated subtherapeutic INR: an evaluation of clinical practice patterns, outcomes, and costs from an anticoagulation clinic.

Authors:  Jamie M Hwang; Thomas N Taylor; Krishna P Sharma; Jennifer L Clemente; Candice L Garwood
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  [Management and therapy of atrial fibrillation in geriatric patients].

Authors:  M Gosch; R E Roller; B Böhmdorfer; U Benvenuti-Falger; B Iglseder; M Lechleitner; U Sommeregger; P Dovjak
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 3.  Anticoagulation: where we are and where we need to go.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Barnes; James B Froehlich
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Validation of knowledge and adherence assessment tools among patients on warfarin therapy in a Saudi hospital anticoagulant clinic.

Authors:  Sireen Abdul Rahim Shilbayeh; Wejdan Ali Almutairi; Sarah Ahmed Alyahya; Nouf Hayef Alshammari; Eiad Shaheen; Alya Adam
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2017-11-30

5.  Use of vitamin K antagonist therapy in geriatrics: a French national survey from the French Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology (SFGG).

Authors:  Matthieu Plichart; Gilles Berrut; Nathalie Maubourguet; Claude Jeandel; Jean-Paul Emeriau; Joël Ankri; Hélène Bouvier; Geneviève Ruault; Olivier Hanon
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  A survey of nursing home physicians to determine laboratory monitoring adverse drug event alert preferences.

Authors:  R D Boyce; S Perera; D A Nace; C M Culley; S M Handler
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  Measuring Harm in Health Care: Optimizing Adverse Event Review.

Authors:  Kathleen E Walsh; Polina Harik; Kathleen M Mazor; Deborah Perfetto; Milena Anatchkova; Colleen Biggins; Joann Wagner; Pamela J Schoettker; Cassandra Firneno; Robert Klugman; Jennifer Tjia
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Novel anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation stroke prevention.

Authors:  Nicholas B Norgard; James J Dinicolantonio; Taylor J Topping; Benjamin Wee
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 9.  Warfarin sensitivity genotyping: a review of the literature and summary of patient experience.

Authors:  Thomas P Moyer; Dennis J O'Kane; Linnea M Baudhuin; Carmen L Wiley; Alexandre Fortini; Pamela K Fisher; Denise M Dupras; Rajeev Chaudhry; Prabin Thapa; Alan R Zinsmeister; John A Heit
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  A team-based approach to warfarin management in long term care: a feasibility study of the MEDeINR electronic decision support system.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Courtney C Kennedy; Glenda Campbell; Jacqueline B Stroud; Luqi Wang; Lisa Dolovich; Mark A Crowther
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.