Literature DB >> 17524445

Removal of antibiotics in conventional and advanced wastewater treatment: implications for environmental discharge and wastewater recycling.

A J Watkinson1, E J Murby, S D Costanzo.   

Abstract

Removal of 28 human and veterinary antibiotics was assessed in a conventional (activated sludge) and advanced (microfiltration/reverse osmosis) wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Brisbane, Australia. The dominant antibiotics detected in wastewater influents were cephalexin (med. 4.6 microg L(-1), freq. 100%), ciprofloxacin (med. 3.8 microg L(-1), freq. 100%), cefaclor (med. 0.5 microg L(-1), freq. 100%), sulphamethoxazole (med. 0.36 microg L(-1), freq. 100%) and trimethoprim (med. 0.34 microg L(-1), freq. 100%). Results indicated that both treatment plants significantly reduced antibiotic concentrations with an average removal rate from the liquid phase of 92%. However, antibiotics were still detected in both effluents from the low-to-mid ng L(-1) range. Antibiotics detected in effluent from the activated sludge WWTP included ciprofloxacin (med. 0.6 microg L(-1), freq. 100%), sulphamethoxazole (med. 0.27 microg L(-1), freq. 100%) lincomycin (med. 0.05 microg L(-1), freq. 100%) and trimethoprim (med. 0.05 microg L(-1), freq. 100%). Antibiotics identified in microfiltration/reverse osmosis product water included naladixic acid (med. 0.045 microg L(-1), freq. 100%), enrofloxacin (med. 0.01 microg L(-1), freq. 100%), roxithromycin (med. 0.01 microg L(-1), freq. 100%), norfloxacin (med. 0.005 microg L(-1), freq. 100%), oleandomycin (med. 0.005 microg L(-1), freq. 100%), trimethoprim (med. 0.005 microg L(-1), freq. 100%), tylosin (med. 0.001 microg L(-1), freq. 100%), and lincomycin (med. 0.001 microg L(-1), freq. 66%). Certain traditional parameters, including nitrate concentration, conductivity and turbidity of the effluent were assessed as predictors of total antibiotic concentration, however only conductivity demonstrated any correlation with total antibiotic concentration (p=0.018, r=0.7). There is currently a lack of information concerning the effects of these chemicals to critically assess potential risks for environmental discharge and water recycling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17524445     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  71 in total

1.  Urban effluent discharges as causes of public and environmental health concerns in South Africa's aquatic milieu.

Authors:  Timothy Sibanda; Ramganesh Selvarajan; Memory Tekere
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Removal of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in rural wastewater by an integrated constructed wetland.

Authors:  Jun Chen; You-Sheng Liu; Hao-Chang Su; Guang-Guo Ying; Feng Liu; Shuang-Shuang Liu; Liang-Ying He; Zhi-Feng Chen; Yong-Qiang Yang; Fan-Rong Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  An overview of cephalosporin antibiotics as emerging contaminants: a serious environmental concern.

Authors:  Nilanjana Das; Jagannathan Madhavan; Adikesavan Selvi; Devlina Das
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Chitosan-based sorbent for efficient removal and extraction of ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin from aqueous solutions.

Authors:  Mahsa Nazraz; Yadollah Yamini; Hamid Asiabi
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 5.833

5.  Distribution of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in chicken manure and manure-fertilized vegetables.

Authors:  Qingxiang Yang; Siwei Ren; Tianqi Niu; Yuhui Guo; Shiyue Qi; Xinkuan Han; Dong Liu; Feng Pan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Antibiotics in hospital effluents: occurrence, contribution to urban wastewater, removal in a wastewater treatment plant, and environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Senar Aydin; Mehmet Emin Aydin; Arzu Ulvi; Havva Kilic
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Global development of the studies focused on antibiotics in aquatic systems from 1945 to 2017.

Authors:  Chun-Li Zheng; James B Cotner; Chikashi Sato; Gang Li; Yao-Yang Xu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Occurrence and dissipation of veterinary antibiotics in two typical swine wastewater treatment systems in east China.

Authors:  Yongshan Chen; Haibo Zhang; Yongming Luo; Jing Song
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Effects of norfloxacin on hepatic genes expression of P450 isoforms (CYP1A and CYP3A), GST and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in Swordtail fish (Xiphophorus Helleri).

Authors:  Ximei Liang; Lan Wang; Ruikang Ou; Xiangping Nie; YuFeng Yang; Fang Wang; Kaibin Li
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Use and environmental occurrence of antibiotics in freestall dairy farms with manured forage fields.

Authors:  Naoko Watanabe; Brian A Bergamaschi; Keith A Loftin; Michael T Meyer; Thomas Harter
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.