Literature DB >> 17524059

Failure of anthropometry as a facial identification technique using high-quality photographs.

Krista F Kleinberg1, Peter Vanezis, A Mike Burton.   

Abstract

Anthropometry can be used in certain circumstances to facilitate comparison of a photograph of a suspect with that of the potential offender from surveillance footage. Experimental research was conducted to determine whether anthropometry has a place in forensic practice in confirming the identity of a suspect from a surveillance video. We examined an existing database of photographic lineups, where one video image was compared against 10 photographs, which has previously been used in psychological research. Target (1) and test (10) photos were of high quality, although taken with a different camera. The anthropometric landmarks of right and left ectocanthions, nasion, and stomion were chosen, and proportions and angle values between these landmarks were measured to compare target with test photos. Results indicate that these measurements failed to accurately identify targets. There was also no indication that any of the landmarks made a better comparison than another. It was concluded that, for these landmarks, this method does not generate the consistent results necessary for use as evidence in a court of law.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17524059     DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00458.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  8 in total

1.  A new atlas for the evaluation of facial features: advantages, limits, and applicability.

Authors:  Stefanie Ritz-Timme; Peter Gabriel; Zuzana Obertovà; Melanie Boguslawski; F Mayer; A Drabik; Pasquale Poppa; Danilo De Angelis; Romina Ciaffi; Benedetta Zanotti; Daniele Gibelli; Cristina Cattaneo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  A new computer-assisted technique to aid personal identification.

Authors:  Danilo De Angelis; Remo Sala; Angela Cantatore; Marco Grandi; Cristina Cattaneo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Validation of forensic facial comparison by morphological analysis in photographic and CCTV samples.

Authors:  Nicholas Bacci; Tobias M R Houlton; Nanette Briers; Maryna Steyn
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 4.  Stable face representations.

Authors:  Rob Jenkins; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Face Recognition by Metropolitan Police Super-Recognisers.

Authors:  David J Robertson; Eilidh Noyes; Andrew J Dowsett; Rob Jenkins; A Mike Burton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  An overview of the latest developments in facial imaging.

Authors:  Carl N Stephan; Jodi M Caple; Pierre Guyomarc'h; Peter Claes
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2018-10-29

7.  Can a spontaneous smile invalidate facial identification by photo-anthropometry?

Authors:  Paulo Henrique Viana Pinto; Caio Henrique Pinke Rodrigues; Juliana Rodrigues Rozatto; Ana Maria Bettoni Rodrigues da Silva; Aline Thais Bruni; Marco Antônio Moreira Rodrigues da Silva; Ricardo Henrique Alves da Silva
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-07-13

Review 8.  Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Nicholas Bacci; Joshua G Davimes; Maryna Steyn; Nanette Briers
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.