Literature DB >> 17523770

Comparison of the effect of low-dose ropivacaine and lidocaine in intravenous regional anaesthesia : a randomised, double-blind clinical study.

Zekiye Bigat1, Bilge Karsli, Neval Boztug, Nihan Cete, Ertugrul Ertok.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID： 17523770     DOI： 10.2165/00044011-200525030-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN： 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

1.  Comparison of ropivacaine and lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia in volunteers: a preliminary study on anesthetic efficacy and blood level.

Authors:  V W Chan; M J Weisbrod; Z Kaszas; C Dragomir
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Comparison of anesthetic effect between 0.375% ropivacaine versus 0.5% lidocaine in forearm intravenous regional anesthesia.

Authors:  Philip W H Peng; Margaret M Coleman; Colin J L McCartney; Susanne Krone; Vincent W S Chan; Zsuzsanna Kaszas; Ivica Vucemilo
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

3.  Quantitative sensory changes in humans after intravenous regional block with mepivacaine.

Authors:  S Kalman; H Svensson; B Lisander; J Boivie
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.288

4.  Systemic toxicity and resuscitation in bupivacaine-, levobupivacaine-, or ropivacaine-infused rats.

Authors:  S Ohmura; M Kawada; T Ohta; K Yamamoto; T Kobayashi
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Ropivacaine.

Authors:  A Casati; R Santorsola; E Cerchierini; E Moizo
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Differences in cardiotoxicity of bupivacaine and ropivacaine are the result of physicochemical and stereoselective properties.

Authors:  Bernhard M Graf; Ingo Abraham; Nicole Eberbach; Gudrun Kunst; David F Stowe; Eike Martin
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Comparison of 0.5% articaine and 0.5% prilocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia of the arm: a cross-over study in volunteers.

Authors:  M T Pitkänen; M Xu; J Haasio; P H Rosenberg
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

8.  Levobupivacaine 0.125% and lidocaine 0.5% for intravenous regional anesthesia in volunteers.

Authors:  Peter G Atanassoff; Rima Aouad; Maximilian W B Hartmannsgruber; Thomas Halaszynski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Comparison of mepivacaine and lidocaine for intravenous regional anaesthesia: pharmacokinetic study and clinical correlation.

Authors:  P Prieto-Alvarez; A Calas-Guerra; J Fuentes-Bellido; E Martínez-Verdera; A Benet-Català; J P Lorenzo-Foz
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Intravenous ropivacaine bolus is a reliable marker of intravascular injection in premedicated healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Colin J L McCartney; Damian B Murphy; Anna Iagounova; Vincent W S Chan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.063
View more
  1 in total

1.  Addition of dexmedetomidine or lornoxicam to prilocaine in intravenous regional anaesthesia for hand or forearm surgery: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Iclal O Kol; Hayati Ozturk; Kenan Kaygusuz; Sinan Gursoy; Baris Comert; Caner Mimaroglu
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.